دورية أكاديمية
The correlation analysis between incisal guidance angle and occlusal plane angles and temporomandibular joint morphology.
| العنوان: | The correlation analysis between incisal guidance angle and occlusal plane angles and temporomandibular joint morphology. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Li X; Department of Stomatology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiefang South Road No. 199, Xuzhou, 221009, China., Shan X; Department of Stomatology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiefang South Road No. 199, Xuzhou, 221009, China., Zhang S; Department of Stomatology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiefang South Road No. 199, Xuzhou, 221009, China., Li Z; Department of Urology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiefang South Road No. 199, Xuzhou, 221009, China. 5744129918@qq.com., Zhang J; Department of Stomatology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiefang South Road No. 199, Xuzhou, 221009, China. 516208419@qq.com. |
| المصدر: | Clinical oral investigations [Clin Oral Investig] 2024 Jul 30; Vol. 28 (8), pp. 455. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 30. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Springer-Verlag Country of Publication: Germany NLM ID: 9707115 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1436-3771 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14326981 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Clin Oral Investig Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Publication: Berlin : Springer-Verlag Original Publication: Berlin : Springer, c1997- |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Malocclusion, Angle Class II*/diagnostic imaging , Malocclusion, Angle Class II*/pathology , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography* , Temporomandibular Joint*/diagnostic imaging , Temporomandibular Joint*/pathology, Humans ; Male ; Female ; Adult ; Incisor/diagnostic imaging ; Incisor/pathology ; Dental Occlusion ; Software |
| مستخلص: | Objectives: The correlations between the incisal guidance angle (IGA) and occlusal plane angles and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) morphology were investigated in adults with skeletal Class II division II malocclusion. Materials and Methods: CBCT images of 37 patients were analyzed. It included 19 cases of skeletal Class II division II malocclusion with low angle (study group) and 18 cases of skeletal Class I average angle (control group). The Invivo Dental 5 software was employed to acquire the data of the incisal guidance angle (IGA), occlusal plane angle (FH-OP), anterior occlusal plane angle (FH-AOP) and the TMJ measurement items. Results: The results of IGA, FH-AOP angle and FH-OP angle showed the study group > the control group (P < 0.05). There were statistically difference in the condylar mediolateral diameters, articular eminence inclination and height, and posterior joint spaces between two groups. No differences were revealed in the condylar anteroposterior diameters, the condylar inclination angle, condylar head width and height, condylar length, glenoid fossa depth and width between two groups. In the study group, IGA showed a moderate correlation with FH-AOP, a weak correlation with FH-OP and condylar mediolateral diameters. Meanwhile, there was a correlation between FH-AOP, FH-OP, and TMJ indicators. Conclusions: The IGA was not only related to FH-AOP and FH-OP, but also to the condylar mediolateral diameters. In addition, there was a correlation between the occlusal plane angles and TMJ morphology in skeletal Class II division II low angle malocclusion. Clinical Relevance: For patients with skeletal Class II division II low angle malocclusion, adjusting the IGA and the occlusal plane angles could improve the esthetic appearance of the anterior teeth, occlusal function, and TMJ morphology. (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.) |
| References: | Jiang H, Li C, Wang Z, Cao J, Shi X, Ma J, Liu H (2014) Assessment of osseous morphology of temporomandibular joint in asymptomatic participants with chewing-side preference. J Oral Rehabil 42(2):105–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12240. (PMID: 10.1111/joor.1224025316207) Tanne K, Tanaka E, Sakuda M (1995) Stress distributions in the TMJ during clenching in patients with vertical discrepancies of the craniofacial complex. J Orofac Pain 9(2):153–160 PMID: 7488985. (PMID: 7488985) Katsavrias EG, Halazonetis DJ (2005) Condyle and fossa shape in Class II and Class III skeletal patterns: a morphometric tomographic study. AM J Orthod Dentofac 128(3):337–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.05.024. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.05.024) Hu H, Lin W, Wu J, Xu H (2022) Research on the correlation between the size of condyle and occlusion plane in skeletal class II malocclusions. Clin Exp Dent Res 8(6):1547–1554. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.672. (PMID: 10.1002/cre2.672362267439760136) Tanaka EM, Sato S (2008) Longitudinal alteration of the occlusal plane and development of different dentoskeletal frames during growth. Am J Orthod Dentofac 134(5),602.e1-11;discussion 602–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.017. Ueki K, Nakagawa K, Takatsuka S, Yamamoto E, Laskin DM (2008) Comparison of the stress direction on the TMJ in patients with class I, II, and III skeletal relationships. Orthod Craniofac Res 11(1):43–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2008.00413.x. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2008.00413.x18199079) Kurusu A, Horiuchi M, Soma K (2009) Relationship between occlusal force and mandibular condyle morphology. Evaluated by limited cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 79(6):1063–1069. https://doi.org/10.2319/120908-620R.1. (PMID: 10.2319/120908-620R.119852595) Burke G, Major P, Glover K, Prasad N (1998) Correlations between condylar characteristics and facial morphology in Class II preadolescent patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac 114(3):328–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70216-1. (PMID: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70216-1) Zhang X (2017) The study on morphology and structure of temporomandibular joint by CBCT for Angle II adult patients. Dissertation, Chinese People’s Liberation Army Medical College. Tinastepe N, Oral K (2015) Investigation of the relationship between increased Vertical Overlap with Minimum Horizontal Overlap and the signs of Temporomandibular disorders. J Prosthodont 24(6):463–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12249. (PMID: 10.1111/jopr.1224925556905) Han S, Shin SM, Choi YS, Kim SY, Ko CC, Kim YI (2018) Morphometric analysis for evaluating the relation between incisal guidance angle, occlusal plane angle, and functional temporomandibular joint shape variation. Acta Odontol Scand 76(4):287–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2017.1420227. (PMID: 10.1080/00016357.2017.142022729322857) Luca L, Manfredini D, Arveda N, Rossi L, Siciliani G (2016) A cone-beam computerized tomography assessment of the relationship between upper incisors inclination and articular eminence features in orthodontically untreated patients with different facial type. J World Fed Orthod 5(2):56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2016.05.001. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2016.05.001) Hilgers ML, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Farman AG (2005) Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofac 128(6):803–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.034. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.034) Larheim TA, Abrahamsson AK, Kristensen M, Arvidsson LZ (2015) Temporomandibular joint diagnostics using CBCT. Dentomaxillofac Rad 44(1):20140235. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140235. (PMID: 10.1259/dmfr.20140235) Ma Q, Bimal P, Mei L, Olliver S, Farella M, Li H (2018) Temporomandibular condylar morphology in diverse maxillary-mandibular skeletal patterns: a 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography study. J Am Dent Assoc 149(7):589–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2018.02.016. (PMID: 10.1016/j.adaj.2018.02.01629655707) Lin M, Xu Y, Wu H, Zhang H, Wang S, Qi K (2019) Comparative cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of temporomandibular joint position and morphology in female patients with skeletal class II malocclusion. J Int Med Res 48(2):300060519892388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060519892388. (PMID: 10.1177/030006051989238831878826) Čelar A, Tafaj E, Graf A, Lettner S (2018) Association of anterior and posterior occlusal planes with different Angle and skeletal classes in permanent dentitions: a lateral cephalometric radiograph study. J Orofac Orthop 79(4):267–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-018-0139-z. (PMID: 10.1007/s00056-018-0139-z297772516061169) Pullinger A, Hollender L (1986) Variation in condyle-fossa relationships according to different methods of evaluation in tomograms. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 62(6):719–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(86)90270-7. (PMID: 10.1016/0030-4220(86)90270-73467295) Ogawa T, Koyano K, Suetsugu T (1997) The influence of anterior guidance and condylar guidance on mandibular protrusive movement. J Oral Rehabil 24(4):303–309. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00479.x. (PMID: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00479.x9147304) Schuyler C (1963) The function and importance of incisal guidance in oral rehabilitation J Prosthet Dent 13(6):1011–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(63)90255-5. Dawson PE (1989) Evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of occlusal problems. Mosby, Baltimore. Thompson JR (1986) Abnormal function of the temporomandibular joints and related musculature. Orthodontic implications. Part II. Angle Orthod 56(3):181–195. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(1986)056%3C0181:PIAFOT%3E2.0.CO;2. (PMID: 10.1043/0003-3219(1986)056<0181:PIAFOT>2.0.CO;23461729) Li Y, Zhou W, Wu Y, Dai H, Zhou J (2021) The relation between incisal guidance angle and the growth and development of temporomandibular joint: a multi-cross-sectional retrospective study. BMC Oral Health 21(1):380. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01716-8. (PMID: 10.1186/s12903-021-01716-8343209738317419) Oancea L, Munteanu I, Macris A, Radulescu S, Ciocan T (2023) A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of the relationship between Incisal and Condylar Guidance. Maedica (Bucur) 18(2):257–265. https://doi.org/10.26574/maedica.2023.18.2.257. (PMID: 10.26574/maedica.2023.18.2.25737588818) Enlow DH, Kuroda T, Lewis AB (1971) Intrinsic craniofacial compensations. Angle Orthod 41(4):271–285. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(1971)041%3C0271:ICC%3E2.0.CO;2. (PMID: 10.1043/0003-3219(1971)041<0271:ICC>2.0.CO;25286714) Harvold EP, Chierici G, Vargervik K (1972) Experiments on the development of dental malocclusions. Am J Orthod 61(1):38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(72)90174-1. (PMID: 10.1016/0002-9416(72)90174-14621365) Brodie AG (1941) On the growth pattern of the human head. From the third month to the eighth year of life. Am J Anat 68:209–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1000680204. (PMID: 10.1002/aja.1000680204) Broadbent B, Yang Y (1981) A new x- ray technique and its application to orthodontia: the introduction of cephalometric radiography. Angle Orthod 51:147–153. Lee SY, Chang YI (1991) A study on the occlusal plane inclination in lateral cephalograph. Korean J Orthod 21(2):367–39727. Milosevic A (2003) Occlusion: I. terms, mandibular movement and the factors of occlusion. Dent Update 30(7):359–361. https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2003.30.7.359. (PMID: 10.12968/denu.2003.30.7.35914558200) Zoghby A, Ré J, Perez C (2009) Functional harmony between the sagittal condylar path inclination and the anterior guidance inclination. Int J Stomatol Occlusion Med 2(3):131–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12548-009-0024-x. (PMID: 10.1007/s12548-009-0024-x) Pelletier LB, Campbell SD (1990) Evaluation of the relationship between anterior and posterior functionally disclusive angles. Part I: literature review, instrumentation, and reproducibility. J Prosthet Dent 63(4):395–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90226-3. (PMID: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90226-32184222) Brose MO, Tanquist RA (1987) The influence of anterior coupling on mandibular movement. J Prosthet Dent 57(3):345–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90310-6. (PMID: 10.1016/0022-3913(87)90310-63471945) Kepron D (1971) Experiences with Modern Occlusal concepts Dent Clin North Am. 15(3):595–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0011-8532(22)01477-x. Celebic A, Alajbeg ZI, Kraljevic-Simunkovic S, Valentic-Peruzovic M (2006) Influence of different condylar and incisal guidance ratios to the activity of anterior and posterior temporal muscle. Arch Oral Biol 52(2):142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2006.08.005. (PMID: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2006.08.00517052681) Stamm T, Vehring A, Ehmer U, Bollmann F (1998) Computer-aided axiography of asymptomatic individuals with class II/2. J Orofac Orthop 59(4):237–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01579168. (PMID: 10.1007/BF015791689713180) Katsavrias EG (2002) Changes in articular eminence inclination during the craniofacial growth period. Angle Orthod 72(3):258–264. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2002)072%3C0258:CIAEID%3E2.0.CO;2. (PMID: 10.1043/0003-3219(2002)072<0258:CIAEID>2.0.CO;212071610) Shreshta P, Jain V, Bhalla A, Pruthi G (2012) A comparative study to measure the condylar guidance by the radiographic and clinical methods. J Adv Prosthodont 4(3):153–157. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.3.153. (PMID: 10.4047/jap.2012.4.3.153229777233439625) Das A, Muddugangadhar BC, Mawani DP, Mukhopadhyay A (2020) Comparative evaluation of sagittal condylar guidance obtained from a clinical method and with cone beam computed tomography in dentate individuals. J Prosthet Dent 125(5):753–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.02.033. (PMID: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.02.03332423552) Kurita H, Ohtsuka A, Kobayashi H, Kurashina K (2001) A study of the relationship between the position of the condylar head and displacement of the temporomandibular joint disk. Dentomaxillofac Rad. 30(3):162–165. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600603. Maurya R, Shukla C, Sthapak A, Chaukse A, Dubey R, Jain S (2015) Computed tomographic analysis of condyle-fossa relationship in skeletal class I and skeletal class II vertically growing males. J Orthod Res 0(0):0. https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-3825.152120. (PMID: 10.4103/2321-3825.152120) Ren YF, Isberg A, Westesson PL (1995) Condyle position in the temporomandibular joint. Comparison between asymptomatic volunteers with normal disk position and patients with disk displacement. Oral Surg Oral Med O 80(1):101–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1079-2104(95)80025-5. (PMID: 10.1016/s1079-2104(95)80025-5) Zheng J, Zhang Y, Wu Q, Xiao H, Li F (2023) Three-dimensional spatial analysis of the temporomandibular joint in adult patients with class II division 2 malocclusion before and after orthodontic treatment: a retrospective study. BMC Oral Health 23(1):477. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03210-9. (PMID: 10.1186/s12903-023-03210-93743880110339615) Basdra EK, Kiokpasoglou M, Stellzig A (2000) The class II Division 2 craniofacial type is associated with numerous congenital tooth anomalies. Eur J Orthodont 22(5):529–535. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/22.5.529. (PMID: 10.1093/ejo/22.5.529) Millett DT, Cunningham SJ, O’Brien KD, Benson PE, de Oliveira CM (2018) Orthodontic treatment for deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD005972. 2 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005972.pub4. Zuaiter S, Robin O, Gebeile-Chauty S, Raberin M (2013) [Does dental class II division 2 predispose to temporomandibular disorders?]. Orthod Fr 84(3):277–285. https://doi.org/10.1051/orthodfr/2013052. (PMID: 10.1051/orthodfr/201305223993369) Cleall JF, BeGole EA (1982) Diagnosis and treatment of class II division 2 malocclusion. Angle Orthod 52(1):38–60. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(1982)052%3C0038:DATOCI%3E2.0.CO;2. (PMID: 10.1043/0003-3219(1982)052<0038:DATOCI>2.0.CO;26950679) Petrikowski CG, Grace MG (1999) Age and gender differences in temporomandibular joint radiographic findings before orthodontic treatment in adolescents. Oral Surg Oral Med O 87(3):380–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1079-2104(99)70228-3. (PMID: 10.1016/s1079-2104(99)70228-3) Katsavrias EG (2006) Morphology of the temporomandibular joint in subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofac 129(4):470–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.01.018. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.01.018) Rivero-Millán P, Barrera-Mora JM, Espinar-Escalona E, González-Del Pino CA, Martín-Salvador D, Llamas-Carreras JM (2021) Comparison of condylar position in normal occlusion, Class II Division 1, Class II Division 2 and Class III malocclusions using CBCT imaging. J Clin Exp Dent 13(12):e1216–e1226. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.58970. (PMID: 10.4317/jced.58970349877148715563) |
| معلومات مُعتمدة: | 31700814 National Natural Science Foundation of China |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Cone-beam computed tomography; Incisal guidance angle; Occlusal plane angle; Skeletal class II division II; Temporomandibular joint |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20240730 Date Completed: 20240730 Latest Revision: 20240730 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20240730 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00784-024-05848-3 |
| PMID: | 39078486 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Find this article in full text from Springer Verlag. 
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 1436-3771 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00784-024-05848-3 |