دورية أكاديمية
Applying the FAO surveillance evaluation tool (SET) to assess the fish farming disease surveillance system in Spain.
| العنوان: | Applying the FAO surveillance evaluation tool (SET) to assess the fish farming disease surveillance system in Spain. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Muniesa A; Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón IA2 (Universidad de Zaragoza - CITA), Zaragoza, Spain., Ruiz-Zarzuela I; Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón IA2 (Universidad de Zaragoza - CITA), Zaragoza, Spain., Lamielle G; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy., Von Dobschuetz S; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy., Furones D; IRTA, La Ràpita, Tarragona, Spain., Rodgers C; Consultant, Tarragona, Spain., Basurco B; Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Zaragoza (CIHEAM-IAMZ), Zaragoza, Spain. |
| المصدر: | Frontiers in veterinary science [Front Vet Sci] 2024 Jul 17; Vol. 11, pp. 1399040. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 17 (Print Publication: 2024). |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Frontiers Media S.A Country of Publication: Switzerland NLM ID: 101666658 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 2297-1769 (Print) Linking ISSN: 22971769 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Front Vet Sci Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: Lausanne : Frontiers Media S.A., [2014]- |
| مستخلص: | EU Member States should ensure that they implement adequate health surveillance schemes in all aquaculture farming areas, as appropriate for the type of production. This study presents the results of applying the FAO's Surveillance Evaluation Tool (SET) to assess the Spanish disease surveillance system for farmed fish species, which although applied previously in livestock production, is applied here to aquaculture for the first time. Overall, there were important score differences between trout and marine fish (seabass and seabream) surveillance, which were higher for trout in the following areas: Institutional (70.8% versus 50.0%), Laboratory (91.7% versus 47.2%), and Surveillance activities (75.3% versus 61.3%). For other categories, the values were lower and no significant differences were found. However, most surveillance efforts focused only on trout, for which there are EU and WOAH listed (notifiable) diseases. In contrast, for seabream and seabass, for which there are no listed diseases, it was considered that surveillance efforts should, nevertheless, be in place and should focus on the identification of abnormal mortalities and emerging diseases, for which there are as yet no standardized harmonised methodologies. Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. (Copyright © 2024 Muniesa, Ruiz-Zarzuela, Lamielle, Von Dobschuetz, Furones, Rodgers and Basurco.) |
| References: | Epidemiol Infect. 2011 Oct;139(10):1486-96. (PMID: 21385516) Sci Rep. 2017 May 02;7:46755. (PMID: 28462930) Trop Med Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 14;3(1):. (PMID: 30274430) Transbound Emerg Dis. 2020 May;67(3):1089-1100. (PMID: 31960605) |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: aquaculture; data collection; emerging fish pathogens; fish diseases; health management; mortality; surveillance evaluation tool |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20240801 Latest Revision: 20240802 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20240802 |
| مُعرف محوري في PubMed: | PMC11290467 |
| DOI: | 10.3389/fvets.2024.1399040 |
| PMID: | 39086769 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 2297-1769 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.3389/fvets.2024.1399040 |