دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Rethinking simultaneous suppression in visual cortex via compressive spatiotemporal population receptive fields.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Rethinking simultaneous suppression in visual cortex via compressive spatiotemporal population receptive fields.
المؤلفون: Kupers ER; Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. ekupers@stanford.edu., Kim I; Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA., Grill-Spector K; Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
المصدر: Nature communications [Nat Commun] 2024 Aug 11; Vol. 15 (1), pp. 6885. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 11.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Nature Pub. Group Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101528555 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2041-1723 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20411723 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Nat Commun Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: [London] : Nature Pub. Group
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Visual Cortex*/physiology , Visual Cortex*/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging* , Photic Stimulation*, Humans ; Male ; Female ; Adult ; Visual Perception/physiology ; Young Adult ; Visual Fields/physiology ; Brain Mapping ; Models, Neurological
مستخلص: When multiple visual stimuli are presented simultaneously in the receptive field, the neural response is suppressed compared to presenting the same stimuli sequentially. The prevailing hypothesis suggests that this suppression is due to competition among multiple stimuli for limited resources within receptive fields, governed by task demands. However, it is unknown how stimulus-driven computations may give rise to simultaneous suppression. Using fMRI, we find simultaneous suppression in single voxels, which varies with both stimulus size and timing, and progressively increases up the visual hierarchy. Using population receptive field (pRF) models, we find that compressive spatiotemporal summation rather than compressive spatial summation predicts simultaneous suppression, and that increased simultaneous suppression is linked to larger pRF sizes and stronger compressive nonlinearities. These results necessitate a rethinking of simultaneous suppression as the outcome of stimulus-driven compressive spatiotemporal computations within pRFs, and open new opportunities to study visual processing capacity across space and time.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)
التعليقات: Update of: bioRxiv. 2024 Apr 01:2023.06.24.546388. doi: 10.1101/2023.06.24.546388. (PMID: 37461470)
References: Duncan, J. The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychol. Rev. 87, 272–300 (1980). (PMID: 738434410.1037/0033-295X.87.3.272)
Scharff, A., Palmer, J. & Moore, C. M. Evidence of fixed capacity in visual object categorization. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 18, 713–721 (2011). (PMID: 2153820210.3758/s13423-011-0101-16999811)
Pelli, D. G., Palomares, M. & Majaj, N. J. Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: distinguishing feature integration from detection. J. Vis. 4, 1136–1169 (2004). (PMID: 1566991710.1167/4.12.12)
Luck, S. J. & Vogel, E. K. The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature 390, 279–281 (1997). (PMID: 938437810.1038/36846)
Miller, E. K., Gochin, P. M. & Gross, C. G. Suppression of visual responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex of the awake macaque by addition of a second stimulus. Brain Res. 616, 25–29 (1993). (PMID: 835861710.1016/0006-8993(93)90187-R)
Recanzone, G. H., Wurtz, R. H. & Schwarz, U. Responses of MT and MST neurons to one and two moving objects in the receptive field. J. Neurophysiol. 78, 2904–2915 (1997). (PMID: 940551110.1152/jn.1997.78.6.2904)
Reynolds, J. H., Chelazzi, L. & Desimone, R. Competitive mechanisms subserve attention in macaque areas V2 and V4. J. Neurosci. 19, 1736–1753 (1999). (PMID: 1002436010.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-05-01736.19996782185)
Kastner, S., de Weerd, P., Desimone, R. & Ungerleider, L. G. Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI. Science 282, 108–111 (1998). (PMID: 975647210.1126/science.282.5386.108)
Kastner, S. et al. Modulation of sensory suppression: implications for receptive field sizes in the human visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 86, 1398–1411 (2001). (PMID: 1153568610.1152/jn.2001.86.3.1398)
Beck, D. M. & Kastner, S. Stimulus context modulates competition in human extrastriate cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1110–1116 (2005). (PMID: 1600708210.1038/nn15011444938)
McMains, S. A. & Kastner, S. Interactions of top–down and bottom–up mechanisms in human visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 31, 587–597 (2011). (PMID: 2122816710.1523/JNEUROSCI.3766-10.20113072218)
Kim, N. Y., Pinsk, M. A. & Kastner, S. Neural basis of biased competition in development: sensory competition in visual cortex of school-aged children. Cereb. Cortex 31, 3107–3121 (2021). (PMID: 3356557910.1093/cercor/bhab009)
Desimone, R. & Duncan, J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu Rev. Neurosci. 18, 193–222 (1995). (PMID: 760506110.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205)
Usher, M. & Niebur, E. Modeling the temporal dynamics of IT neurons in visual search: a mechanism for top-down selective attention. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 8, 311–327 (1996). (PMID: 2397150310.1162/jocn.1996.8.4.311)
Deco, G. & Rolls, E. T. Neurodynamics of biased competition and cooperation for attention: a model with spiking neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 94, 295–313 (2005). (PMID: 1570322710.1152/jn.01095.2004)
Scalf, P. E. & Beck, D. M. Competition in visual cortex impedes attention to multiple items. J. Neurosci. 30, 161–169 (2010). (PMID: 2005389810.1523/JNEUROSCI.4207-09.20103164532)
Maunsell, J. H. & Newsome, W. T. Visual processing in monkey extrastriate cortex. Annu Rev. Neurosci. 10, 363–401 (1987). (PMID: 310541410.1146/annurev.ne.10.030187.002051)
Dumoulin, S. O. & Wandell, B. A. Population receptive field estimates in human visual cortex. Neuroimage 39, 647–660 (2008). (PMID: 1797702410.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.034)
Wandell, B. A. & Winawer, J. Computational neuroimaging and population receptive fields. Trends Cogn. Sci. 19, 349–357 (2015). (PMID: 2585073010.1016/j.tics.2015.03.0094484758)
Reynolds, J. H. & Heeger, D. J. The normalization model of attention. Neuron 61, 168–185 (2009). (PMID: 1918616110.1016/j.neuron.2009.01.0022752446)
Albrecht, D. G. & Hamilton, D. B. Striate cortex of monkey and cat: contrast response function. J. Neurophysiol. 48, 217–237 (1982). (PMID: 711984610.1152/jn.1982.48.1.217)
Press, W. A., Brewer, A. A., Dougherty, R. F., Wade, A. R. & Wandell, B. A. Visual areas and spatial summation in human visual cortex. Vision Res. 41, 1321–1332 (2001). (PMID: 1132297710.1016/S0042-6989(01)00074-8)
Hansen, K. A., David, S. V. & Gallant, J. L. Parametric reverse correlation reveals spatial linearity of retinotopic human V1 BOLD response. NeuroImage 23, 233–241 (2004). (PMID: 1532537010.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.012)
Solomon, S. G., White, A. J. & Martin, P. R. Extraclassical receptive field properties of parvocellular, magnocellular, and koniocellular cells in the primate lateral geniculate nucleus. J. Neurosci. 22, 338–349 (2002). (PMID: 1175651710.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-01-00338.20026757604)
Pihlaja, M., Henriksson, L., James, A. C. & Vanni, S. Quantitative multifocal fMRI shows active suppression in human V1. Hum. Brain Mapp. 29, 1001–1014 (2008). (PMID: 1838176810.1002/hbm.204426870839)
Vanni, S. & Rosenstrom, T. Local non-linear interactions in the visual cortex may reflect global decorrelation. J. Comput. Neurosci. 30, 109–124 (2011). (PMID: 2042244510.1007/s10827-010-0239-2)
Kay, K. N., Winawer, J., Mezer, A. & Wandell, B. A. Compressive spatial summation in human visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 110, 481–494 (2013). (PMID: 2361554610.1152/jn.00105.20133727075)
Tolhurst, D. J., Walker, N. S., Thompson, I. D. & Dean, A. F. Non-linearities of temporal summation in neurones in area 17 of the cat. Exp. Brain Res. 38, 431–435 (1980). (PMID: 624497210.1007/BF00237523)
Boynton, G. M., Engel, S. A., Glover, G. H. & Heeger, D. J. Linear systems analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging in human V1. J. Neurosci. 16, 4207–4221 (1996). (PMID: 875388210.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-13-04207.19966579007)
Birn, R. M., Saad, Z. S. & Bandettini, P. A. Spatial heterogeneity of the nonlinear dynamics in the FMRI BOLD response. Neuroimage 14, 817–826 (2001). (PMID: 1155480010.1006/nimg.2001.0873)
Miller, K. L. et al. Nonlinear temporal dynamics of the cerebral blood flow response. Hum. Brain Mapp. 13, 1–12 (2001). (PMID: 1128404210.1002/hbm.10206871988)
Motter, B. C. Modulation of transient and sustained response components of V4 neurons by temporal crowding in flashed stimulus sequences. J. Neurosci. 26, 9683–9694 (2006). (PMID: 1698803910.1523/JNEUROSCI.5495-05.20066674438)
Hasson, U., Yang, E., Vallines, I., Heeger, D. J. & Rubin, N. A hierarchy of temporal receptive windows in human cortex. J. Neurosci. 28, 2539–2550 (2008). (PMID: 1832209810.1523/JNEUROSCI.5487-07.20082556707)
Yesilyurt, B., Ugurbil, K. & Uludag, K. Dynamics and nonlinearities of the BOLD response at very short stimulus durations. Magn. Reson Imaging 26, 853–862 (2008). (PMID: 1847987610.1016/j.mri.2008.01.008)
Horiguchi, H., Nakadomari, S., Misaki, M. & Wandell, B. A. Two temporal channels in human V1 identified using fMRI. Neuroimage 47, 273–280 (2009). (PMID: 1936156110.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.078)
Nishimoto, S. & Gallant, J. L. A three-dimensional spatiotemporal receptive field model explains responses of area MT neurons to naturalistic movies. J. Neurosci. 31, 14551–14564 (2011). (PMID: 2199437210.1523/JNEUROSCI.6801-10.20113338855)
Honey, C. J. et al. Slow cortical dynamics and the accumulation of information over long timescales. Neuron 76, 423–434 (2012). (PMID: 2308374310.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.0113517908)
Mattar, M. G., Kahn, D. A., Thompson-Schill, S. L. & Aguirre, G. K. Varying timescales of stimulus integration unite neural adaptation and prototype formation. Curr. Biol. 26, 1669–1676 (2016). (PMID: 2732199910.1016/j.cub.2016.04.0654942354)
Stigliani, A., Jeska, B. & Grill-Spector, K. Encoding model of temporal processing in human visual cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, E11047–E11056 (2017). (PMID: 2920871410.1073/pnas.17048771145754759)
Zhou, J., Benson, N. C., Kay, K. N. & Winawer, J. Compressive temporal summation in human visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 38, 691–709 (2018). (PMID: 2919212710.1523/JNEUROSCI.1724-17.20175777115)
Stigliani, A., Jeska, B. & Grill-Spector, K. Differential sustained and transient temporal processing across visual streams. PLoS Comput. Biol. 15, e1007011 (2019). (PMID: 3114572310.1371/journal.pcbi.10070116583966)
Zhou, J., Benson, N. C., Kay, K. & Winawer, J. Predicting neuronal dynamics with a delayed gain control model. PLoS Comput. Biol. 15, e1007484 (2019). (PMID: 3174738910.1371/journal.pcbi.10074846892546)
Hendrikx, E., Paul, J. M., van Ackooij, M., van der Stoep, N. & Harvey, B. M. Visual timing-tuned responses in human association cortices and response dynamics in early visual cortex. Nat. Commun. 13, 3952 (2022). (PMID: 3580402610.1038/s41467-022-31675-99270326)
Groen, I. I. A. et al. Temporal dynamics of neural responses in human visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 42, 7562–7580 (2022). (PMID: 3599905410.1523/JNEUROSCI.1812-21.20229546476)
Friston, K. J., Mechelli, A., Turner, R. & Price, C. J. Nonlinear responses in fMRI: the Balloon model, Volterra kernels, and other hemodynamics. Neuroimage 12, 466–477 (2000). (PMID: 1098804010.1006/nimg.2000.0630)
Henson, R. N., Price, C. J., Rugg, M. D., Turner, R. & Friston, K. J. Detecting latency differences in event-related BOLD responses: application to words versus nonwords and initial versus repeated face presentations. Neuroimage 15, 83–97 (2002). (PMID: 1177197610.1006/nimg.2001.0940)
Lewis, L. D., Setsompop, K., Rosen, B. R. & Polimeni, J. R. Fast fMRI can detect oscillatory neural activity in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, E6679–E6685 (2016). (PMID: 2772952910.1073/pnas.16081171135087037)
Zuiderbaan, W., Harvey, B. M. & Dumoulin, S. O. Modeling center-surround configurations in population receptive fields using fMRI. J. Vis. 12, 10 (2012). (PMID: 2240804110.1167/12.3.10)
DeSimone, K. & Schneider, K. A. Distinguishing hemodynamics from function in the human LGN using a temporal response model. Vision (2019).
Aqil, M., Knapen, T. & Dumoulin, S. O. Divisive normalization unifies disparate response signatures throughout the human visual hierarchy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2021).
Kim, I., Kupers, E. R., Lerma-Usabiaga, G. & Grill-Spector, K. Characterizing spatiotemporal population receptive fields in human visual cortex with fMRI. J. Neurosci. 44, e0803232023 (2024). (PMID: 3796376810.1523/JNEUROSCI.0803-23.202310866195)
Maunsell, J. H., Nealey, T. A. & DePriest, D. D. Magnocellular and parvocellular contributions to responses in the middle temporal visual area (MT) of the macaque monkey. J. Neurosci. 10, 3323–3334 (1990). (PMID: 221314210.1523/JNEUROSCI.10-10-03323.19906570195)
De Valois, R. L. & Cottaris, N. P. Inputs to directionally selective simple cells in macaque striate cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 14488–14493 (1998). (PMID: 982672710.1073/pnas.95.24.1448824400)
Ray, S. & Maunsell, J. H. Different origins of gamma rhythm and high-gamma activity in macaque visual cortex. PLoS Biol. 9, e1000610 (2011). (PMID: 2153274310.1371/journal.pbio.10006103075230)
Jacques, C. et al. Corresponding ECoG and fMRI category-selective signals in human ventral temporal cortex. Neuropsychologia 83, 14–28 (2016). (PMID: 2621207010.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.07.024)
Finzi, D. et al. Differential spatial computations in ventral and lateral face-selective regions are scaffolded by structural connections. Nat. Commun. 12, 2278 (2021). (PMID: 3385919510.1038/s41467-021-22524-28050273)
Croner, L. J. & Kaplan, E. Receptive fields of P and M ganglion cells across the primate retina. Vision Res. 35, 7–24 (1995). (PMID: 783961210.1016/0042-6989(94)E0066-T)
Henry, C. A., Jazayeri, M., Shapley, R. M. & Hawken, M. J. Distinct spatiotemporal mechanisms underlie extra-classical receptive field modulation in macaque V1 microcircuits. Elife (2020).
Polimeni, J. R. & Lewis, L. D. Imaging faster neural dynamics with fast fMRI: a need for updated models of the hemodynamic response. Prog. Neurobiol. 207, 102174 (2021). (PMID: 3452540410.1016/j.pneurobio.2021.1021748688322)
Macevoy, S. P. & Epstein, R. A. Decoding the representation of multiple simultaneous objects in human occipitotemporal cortex. Curr. Biol. 19, 943–947 (2009). (PMID: 1944645410.1016/j.cub.2009.04.0202875119)
Rust, N. C. & Dicarlo, J. J. Selectivity and tolerance (“invariance”) both increase as visual information propagates from cortical area V4 to IT. J. Neurosci. 30, 12978–12995 (2010). (PMID: 2088111610.1523/JNEUROSCI.0179-10.20102975390)
Cheng, K., Hasegawa, T., Saleem, K. S. & Tanaka, K. Comparison of neuronal selectivity for stimulus speed, length, and contrast in the prestriate visual cortical areas V4 and MT of the macaque monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 71, 2269–2280 (1994). (PMID: 793151610.1152/jn.1994.71.6.2269)
Tootell, R. B. et al. Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurosci. 15, 3215–3230 (1995). (PMID: 772265810.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-04-03215.19956577785)
Smith, A. T., Greenlee, M. W., Singh, K. D., Kraemer, F. M. & Hennig, J. The processing of first- and second-order motion in human visual cortex assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). J. Neurosci. 18, 3816–3830 (1998). (PMID: 957081110.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-10-03816.19986793149)
Vanduffel, W. et al. Visual motion processing investigated using contrast agent-enhanced fMRI in awake behaving monkeys. Neuron 32, 565–577 (2001). (PMID: 1171919910.1016/S0896-6273(01)00502-5)
An, X. et al. Distinct functional organizations for processing different motion signals in V1, V2, and V4 of macaque. J. Neurosci. 32, 13363–13379 (2012). (PMID: 2301542710.1523/JNEUROSCI.1900-12.20126621371)
Nandy, A. S., Mitchell, J. F., Jadi, M. P. & Reynolds, J. H. Neurons in macaque area V4 are tuned for complex spatio-temporal patterns. Neuron 91, 920–930 (2016). (PMID: 2749908510.1016/j.neuron.2016.07.0264990477)
Mikellidou, K. et al. Cortical BOLD responses to moderate- and high-speed motion in the human visual cortex. Sci. Rep. 8, 8357 (2018). (PMID: 2984442610.1038/s41598-018-26507-05974286)
Adelson, E. H. & Bergen, J. R. Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 284–299 (1985). (PMID: 397376210.1364/JOSAA.2.000284)
Watson, A. B. & Ahumada, A. J. Jr. Model of human visual-motion sensing. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 322–341 (1985). (PMID: 397376410.1364/JOSAA.2.000322)
Heeger, D. J. Modeling simple-cell direction selectivity with normalized, half-squared, linear operators. J. Neurophysiol. 70, 1885–1898 (1993). (PMID: 829496110.1152/jn.1993.70.5.1885)
Simoncelli, E. P. & Heeger, D. J. A model of neuronal responses in visual area MT. Vision Res. 38, 743–761 (1998). (PMID: 960410310.1016/S0042-6989(97)00183-1)
Russ, B. E., Koyano, K. W., Day-Cooney, J., Perwez, N. & Leopold, D. A. Temporal continuity shapes visual responses of macaque face patch neurons. Neuron 111, 903–914 e903 (2023). (PMID: 3663096210.1016/j.neuron.2022.12.02110023462)
Wallis, G. & Bulthoff, H. Learning to recognize objects. Trends Cogn. Sci. 3, 22–31 (1999). (PMID: 1023422310.1016/S1364-6613(98)01261-3)
Zhuang, C. et al. Unsupervised neural network models of the ventral visual stream. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2021).
Weiner, K. S. & Grill-Spector, K. Neural representations of faces and limbs neighbor in human high-level visual cortex: evidence for a new organization principle. Psychol. Res. 77, 74–97 (2013). (PMID: 2213902210.1007/s00426-011-0392-x)
Pitcher, D. & Ungerleider, L. G. Evidence for a third visual pathway specialized for social perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 25, 100–110 (2021). (PMID: 3333469310.1016/j.tics.2020.11.006)
Wurm, M. F. & Caramazza, A. Two ‘what’ pathways for action and object recognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 26, 103–116 (2022). (PMID: 3470266110.1016/j.tics.2021.10.003)
Mruczek, R. E. & Sheinberg, D. L. Context familiarity enhances target processing by inferior temporal cortex neurons. J. Neurosci. 27, 8533–8545 (2007). (PMID: 1768703110.1523/JNEUROSCI.2106-07.20076672944)
Brady, T. F., Konkle, T. & Alvarez, G. A. Compression in visual working memory: using statistical regularities to form more efficient memory representations. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 138, 487–502 (2009). (PMID: 1988313210.1037/a0016797)
Ihssen, N., Linden, D. E. & Shapiro, K. L. Improving visual short-term memory by sequencing the stimulus array. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 17, 680–686 (2010). (PMID: 2103716610.3758/PBR.17.5.680)
Brainard, D. H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spat. Vis. 10, 433–436 (1997). (PMID: 917695210.1163/156856897X00357)
Dale, A. M., Fischl, B. & Sereno, M. I. Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 9, 179–194 (1999). (PMID: 993126810.1006/nimg.1998.0395)
Poltoratski, S., Kay, K., Finzi, D. & Grill-Spector, K. Holistic face recognition is an emergent phenomenon of spatial processing in face-selective regions. Nat. Commun. 12, 4745 (2021). (PMID: 3436288310.1038/s41467-021-24806-18346587)
Smith, A. T., Singh, K. D., Williams, A. L. & Greenlee, M. W. Estimating receptive field size from fMRI data in human striate and extrastriate visual cortex. Cereb. Cortex 11, 1182–1190 (2001). (PMID: 1170948910.1093/cercor/11.12.1182)
Witthoft, N. et al. Where is human V4? Predicting the location of hV4 and VO1 from cortical folding. Cereb. Cortex 24, 2401–2408 (2014). (PMID: 2359282310.1093/cercor/bht092)
Amano, K., Wandell, B. A. & Dumoulin, S. O. Visual field maps, population receptive field sizes, and visual field coverage in the human MT+ complex. J. Neurophysiol. 102, 2704–2718 (2009). (PMID: 1958732310.1152/jn.00102.20092777836)
Swisher, J. D., Halko, M. A., Merabet, L. B., McMains, S. A. & Somers, D. C. Visual topography of human intraparietal sulcus. J. Neurosci. 27, 5326–5337 (2007). (PMID: 1750755510.1523/JNEUROSCI.0991-07.20076672354)
Watson, A. B. in Handbook of Perception and Human Performance (eds Boff, K., Kaufman, L. & Thomas, J.) Ch. 6 (Wiley, 1986).
Kupers, E. R., Kim, I. & Grill-Spector, K. Source data files for “Rethinking simultaneous suppression in visual cortex via compressive spatiotemporal population receptive fields”. Data repository at https://osf.io/rpuhs (2024).
Kupers, E. R., Kim, I. & Grill-Spector, K. Code repository of the paper “Rethinking simultaneous suppression in visual cortex via compressive spatiotemporal population receptive fields”. Code repository at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12658143 (2024).
SpatiotemporalPRFs: a MATLAB software toolbox to create spatiotemporal population receptive fields using fMRI. v. 1.0.2. Code repository at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12658232 (2024).
Hessels, R. S., Niehorster, D. C., Kemner, C. & Hooge, I. T. C. Noise-robust fixation detection in eye movement data: identification by two-means clustering. Behav. Res. Methods 49, 1802–1823 (2017). (PMID: 2780058210.3758/s13428-016-0822-1)
معلومات مُعتمدة: R01 EY023915 United States EY NEI NIH HHS
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240811 Date Completed: 20240811 Latest Revision: 20240814
رمز التحديث: 20240815
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC11317513
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-51243-7
PMID: 39128923
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:2041-1723
DOI:10.1038/s41467-024-51243-7