دورية أكاديمية

Green finance pilot policy and corporate environmental social responsibility: empirical evidence from China's green finance reform and innovation pilot zones.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Green finance pilot policy and corporate environmental social responsibility: empirical evidence from China's green finance reform and innovation pilot zones.
المؤلفون: Xie Q; School of Economics, Yunnan University, Wujiaying Ave., Kunming, 650500, China. cgxql778159@163.com.
المصدر: Environmental science and pollution research international [Environ Sci Pollut Res Int] 2024 Aug; Vol. 31 (40), pp. 52784-52803. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 19.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Springer Country of Publication: Germany NLM ID: 9441769 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1614-7499 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09441344 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: <2013->: Berlin : Springer
Original Publication: Landsberg, Germany : Ecomed
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Social Responsibility*, China ; Environmental Policy ; Pilot Projects ; Conservation of Natural Resources
مستخلص: The establishment of green finance reform and innovation pilot zone (GFRIPZ) is a pivotal strategy for harmonizing the twin goals of economic prosperity and environmental preservation. By applying panel data on Chinese A-share listed firms from 2011 to 2022, this study examines the influence of China's green finance pilot policy on corporate environmental social responsibility (ESR) using a difference-in-differences (DID) model. The study's findings indicate that the green finance pilot policy promotes corporate environmental social responsibility. The results remain robust after a series of robustness tests. Moreover, mechanism analysis reveals that the pilot policy promotes firms' ESR through three key channels: financing constraints, green innovation, and corporate governance mechanisms. Additionally, analyst attention can positively moderate the promotional effect of the green finance pilot policy on corporate ESR. Furthermore, this study reveals that the green finance pilot policy's impact on corporate ESR is more pronounced among large-scale firms and firms operating in regions characterized by stringent environmental regulations and greater marketization. The empirical findings present evidence for enhancing ESR through the implementation of the green finance pilot policy in China and offer insights for refining the green finance system.
(© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)
References: Babiak K, Trendafilova S (2011) CSR and environmental responsibility: motives and pressures to adopt green management practices. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 18(1):11–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.229. (PMID: 10.1002/csr.229)
Bai J, Chen Z, Yan X, Zhang Y (2022) Research on the impact of green finance on carbon emissions: evidence from China. Econ Res Ekon Istraživanja 35:6965–6984. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2054455. (PMID: 10.1080/1331677X.2022.2054455)
Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173. (PMID: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173)
Berrone P, Fosfuri A, Gelabert L, Gomez-Mejia LR (2013) Necessity as the mother of ‘green’ inventions: institutional pressures and environmental innovations. Strateg Manag J 34(8):891–909. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2041. (PMID: 10.1002/smj.2041)
Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Q J Econ 119(1):249–275. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355304772839588. (PMID: 10.1162/003355304772839588)
Bimo ID, Silalahi EE, Kusumadewi NLGL (2022) Corporate governance and investment efficiency in Indonesia: The moderating role of industry competition. J Financ Report Accoount 20(2):371–384. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-12-2020-0351. (PMID: 10.1108/JFRA-12-2020-0351)
Brammer S, Pavelin S (2008) Factors influencing the quality of corporate environmental disclosure. Bus Strateg Environ 17(2):120–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.506. (PMID: 10.1002/bse.506)
Bushman R, Chen Q, Engel E, Smith A (2004) Financial accounting information, organizational complexity and corporate governance systems. J Account Econ 37(2):167–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.09.005. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.09.005)
Cai X, Song X (2024) Towards sustainable environment: unleashing the mechanism between green finance and corporate social responsibility. Energy Environ 35(2):986–1003. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X221133258. (PMID: 10.1177/0958305X221133258)
Cai X, Lu Y, Wu M, Yu L (2016) Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. J Dev Econ 123:73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2016.08.003. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2016.08.003)
Chen IJ, Chen SS (2017) Corporate governance and the investment efficiency of diversified corporate asset buyers. J Appl Corp Financ 29(1):99–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12224. (PMID: 10.1111/jacf.12224)
Chen J, Cumming D, Hou W, Lee E (2016) Does the external monitoring effect of financial analysts deter corporate fraud in China? J Bus Ethics 134:727–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2393-3. (PMID: 10.1007/s10551-014-2393-3)
Chen S, Wang Y, Albitar K, Huang Z (2021) Does ownership concentration affect corporate environmental responsibility engagement? The mediating role of corporate leverage. Borsa Istanb Rev 21:S13–S24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.02.001. (PMID: 10.1016/j.bir.2021.02.001)
Chen Y, Xu Z, Wang X, Yang Y (2023) How does green credit policy improve corporate social responsibility in China? An analysis based on carbon-intensive listed firms. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 30(2):889–904. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2395. (PMID: 10.1002/csr.2395)
De Blas MdM (2021) Impact of environmental performance and policy on firm environmental reputation. Manag Decis 59(2):190–204. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-09-2019-1223. (PMID: 10.1108/md-09-2019-1223)
Deb BC, Rahman MM, Haseeb M (2024) Unveiling the impact on corporate social responsibility through green tax and green financing: a PLS-SEM approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31(1):1543–1561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31150-y. (PMID: 10.1007/s11356-023-31150-y)
Du X, Jian W, Zeng Q, Du Y (2014) Corporate environmental responsibility in polluting industries: does religion matter? J Bus Ethics 124:485–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1888-7. (PMID: 10.1007/s10551-013-1888-7)
Dummett K (2006) Drivers for corporate environmental responsibility (CER). Environ Dev Sustain 8:375–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-005-7900-3. (PMID: 10.1007/s10668-005-7900-3)
Fafaliou I, Giaka M, Konstantios D, Polemis M (2022) Firms’ ESG reputational risk and market longevity: a firm-level analysis for the United States. J Bus Res 149:161–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.010. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.010)
Fan G, Wang X, Zhang L, Zhu H (2003) Marketization Index for China’s provinces. Econ Res J 3:9–18+89 (in Chinese. CNKI:SUN:JJYJ.0.2003-03-001).
Fang J, Haw IM, Yu V, Zhang X (2014) Positive externality of analyst coverage upon audit services: evidence from China. Asia-Pac J Account Econ 21(2):186–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2013.854949. (PMID: 10.1080/16081625.2013.854949)
Frankel R, Kothari SP, Weber J (2006) Determinants of the informativeness of analyst research. J Account Econ 41(1–2):29–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.10.004. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.10.004)
Hammoudeh S, Ajmi AN, Mokni K (2020) Relationship between green bonds and financial and environmental variables: a novel time-varying causality. Energy Econ 92:104941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.10494. (PMID: 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.10494)
He L, Zhong T, Gan S (2022) Green finance and corporate environmental responsibility: evidence from heavily polluting listed enterprises in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(49):74081–74096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21065-5. (PMID: 10.1007/s11356-022-21065-5)
Hua M, Li Z, Zhang Y, Wei X (2024) Does green finance promote green transformation of the real economy? Res Int Bus Financ 67:102090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102090. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102090)
Huang CL, Kung FH (2010) Drivers of environmental disclosure and stakeholder expectation: evidence from Taiwan. J Bus Ethics 96(3):435–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0476-3. (PMID: 10.1007/s10551-010-0476-3)
Huang H, Mbanyele W, Wang F, Zhang C, Zhao X (2023) Nudging corporate environmental responsibility through green finance? Quasi-natural experimental evidence from China. J Bus Res 167:114147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114147. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114147)
Iraldo F, Testa F, Melis M, Frey M (2011) A literature review on the links between environmental regulation and competitiveness. Environ Policy Gov 21(3):210–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.568. (PMID: 10.1002/eet.568)
Jenson MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3(4):305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x. (PMID: 10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x)
Jiang Y, Guo C, Wu Y (2022) Does digital finance improve the green investment of Chinese listed heavily polluting companies? The perspective of corporate financialization. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(47):71047–71063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20803-z. (PMID: 10.1007/s11356-022-20803-z)
Jiang X, Li G, Fan X (2023) Environmental protection fee-to-tax and corporate environmental social responsibility: a test based on corporate life cycle theory. Sustainability 15(3):2128. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032128. (PMID: 10.3390/su15032128)
Klapper LF, Love I (2004) Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets. J Corp Financ 10(5):703–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(03)00046-4. (PMID: 10.1016/S0929-1199(03)00046-4)
Lang M, Lins K, Miller D (2004) Concentrated control, analyst following, and valuation: do analysts matter most when investors are protected least? J Account Res 42(3):586–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.t01-1-00142.x. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.t01-1-00142.x)
Lee JW, Kim YM, Kim YE (2018) Antecedents of adopting corporate environmental responsibility and green practices. J Bus Ethics 148:397–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3024-y. (PMID: 10.1007/s10551-016-3024-y)
Lewis KV, Cassells S, Roxas H (2015) SMEs and the potential for a collaborative path to environmental responsibility. Bus Strateg Environ 24(8):750–764. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1843. (PMID: 10.1002/bse.1843)
Li X, Wang Z, Yu Y, Chen Y (2023) Does green finance promote the social responsibility fulfilment of highly polluting enterprises?–Empirical evidence from China. Econ Res Ekon Istraživanja 36(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2153719.
Liu S, Wang Y (2023) Green innovation effect of pilot zones for green finance reform: evidence of quasi natural experiment. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 186:122079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122079. (PMID: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122079)
Lu J, Wang J (2021) Corporate governance, law, culture, environmental performance and CSR disclosure: a global perspective. J Int Financ Mark Inst Money 70:101264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2020.101264. (PMID: 10.1016/j.intfin.2020.101264)
Lu N, Wu J, Liu Z (2022) How does green finance reform affect enterprise green technology innovation? Evidence from China. Sustainability 14(16):9865. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169865. (PMID: 10.3390/su14169865)
Luo X, Bhattacharya CB (2006) Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. J Mark 70(4):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.4.001. (PMID: 10.1509/jmkg.70.4.001)
Ma D, He Y, Zeng L (2024) Can green finance improve the ESG performance? Evidence from green credit policy in China. Energy Econ 107772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107772.
Macey JR, O'hara M (2003) The corporate governance of banks. Economic policy review 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/13581980610711144.
Madaleno M, Dogan E, Taskin D (2022) A step forward on sustainability: the nexus of environmental responsibility, green technology, clean energy and green finance. Energy Econ 109:105945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105945. (PMID: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105945)
Mamun MA, Sabri B, Duc KN (2022) Green finance and decarbonization: EVIDENCE from around the world. Financ Res Lett 46:102–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102807. (PMID: 10.1016/j.frl.2022.102807)
Meng XH, Zeng SX, Tam CM, Xu XD (2012) Whether top executives’ turnover influences environmental responsibility: from the perspective of environmental information disclosure. J Bus Ethics 114:341–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1351-1. (PMID: 10.1007/s10551-012-1351-1)
Meo MS, Abd Karim MZ (2022) The role of green finance in reducing CO2 emissions: an empirical analysis. Borsa Istanb Rev 22(1):169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.03.002. (PMID: 10.1016/j.bir.2021.03.002)
Nejati M, Amran A, Hazlina Ahmad N (2014) Examining stakeholders’ influence on environmental responsibility of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises and its outcomes. Manag Decis 52(10):2021–2043. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2014-0109. (PMID: 10.1108/MD-02-2014-0109)
Ning Y, Cherian J, Sial MS, Álvarez-Otero S, Comite U, Zia-Ud-Din M (2023) Green bond as a new determinant of sustainable green financing, energy efficiency investment, and economic growth: a global perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(22):61324–61339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18454-7. (PMID: 10.1007/s11356-021-18454-7)
Peng Y, Ji Y (2022) Can informal environmental regulation promote green innovation?–A quasi-natural experiment based on environmental information disclosure policy. Pol J Environ Stud 31(3):2795. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/145189. (PMID: 10.15244/pjoes/145189)
Porter ME (1991) Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strateg Manag J 12(S2):95–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250121008. (PMID: 10.1002/smj.4250121008)
Ramus T, Vaccaro A (2017) Stakeholders matter: how social enterprises address mission drift. J Bus Ethics 143:307–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2353-y. (PMID: 10.1007/s10551-014-2353-y)
Reinhardt FL (1998) Environmental product differentiation: implications for corporate strategy. Calif Manag Rev 40(4):43–73. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165964. (PMID: 10.2307/41165964)
Sharma S (2000) Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Acad Manag J 43(3):681–697. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556361. (PMID: 10.5465/1556361)
Si L, Cao Y (2022) Does green credit policies improve corporate environmental social responsibility——the perspective of external constraints and internal concerns. China Ind Econ 04:137–155. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2022.04.009 . (in Chinese). (PMID: 10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2022.04.009)
Sun X, Zhang A, Zhu M (2023) Impact of pilot zones for green finance reform and innovations on green technology innovations: evidence from chinese manufacturing corporates. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(15):43901–43913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25371-4. (PMID: 10.1007/s11356-023-25371-4)
Tang C, Xu Y, Hao Y, Wu H, Xue Y (2021) What is the role of telecommunications infrastructure construction in green technology innovation? A firm-level analysis for China. Energy Econ 103:105576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105576. (PMID: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105576)
Walls JL, Berrone P, Phan PH (2012) Corporate governance and environmental performance: is there really a link? Strateg Manag J 33(8):885–913. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1952. (PMID: 10.1002/smj.1952)
Weng HH, Chen JS, Chen PC (2015) Effects of green innovation on environmental and corporate performance: a stakeholder perspective. Sustainability 7(5):4997–5026. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7054997. (PMID: 10.3390/su7054997)
Wood DJ (1991) Corporate social performance revisited. Acad Manag Rev 16(4):691–718. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279616. (PMID: 10.5465/amr.1991.4279616)
Yan C, Mao Z, Ho KC (2022) Effect of green financial reform and innovation pilot zones on corporate investment efficiency. Energy Econ 113:106185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106185. (PMID: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106185)
Yu F (2008) Analyst coverage and earnings management. J Financ Econ 88(2):245–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.05.008. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.05.008)
Yu CH, Wu X, Zhang D, Chen S, Zhao J (2021) Demand for green finance: resolving financing constraints on green innovation in China. Energy Policy 153:112255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112255. (PMID: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112255)
Zhang D (2022) Green financial system regulation shock and greenwashing behaviors: evidence from Chinese firms. Energy Econ 111:106064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106064. (PMID: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106064)
Zhang WK, Luo Q, Liu S (2022) Is government regulation a push for corporate environmental performance? Evidence from China. Econ Anal Policy 74:105–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.01.018. (PMID: 10.1016/j.eap.2022.01.018)
Zhang H, Wang Y, Li R, Si H, Liu W (2023a) Can green finance promote urban green development? Evidence from green finance reform and innovation pilot zone in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(5):12041–12058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22886-0. (PMID: 10.1007/s11356-022-22886-0)
Zhang Y, Fang X, Yang Z, Sun Y, Wang Q (2023b) Green finance, technological innovation, and energy efficiency improvements: evidence from China’s green finance reform pilot zone. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 59(11):3531–3549. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2023.2226324. (PMID: 10.1080/1540496X.2023.2226324)
Zhao L, Wang D, Wang X, Zhang Z (2023) Impact of green finance on total factor productivity of heavily polluting enterprises: evidence from green finance reform and innovation pilot zone. Econ Anal Policy 79:765–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.06.045. (PMID: 10.1016/j.eap.2023.06.045)
Zheng M, Chang Z (2023) Green and low-carbon transition and environmental corporate social responsibility—a quasi-natural experiment based on low-carbon city pilots. Res Econ Manag 44(07):126–144. https://doi.org/10.13502/j.cnki.issn1000-7636.2023.07.008 . (in Chinese). (PMID: 10.13502/j.cnki.issn1000-7636.2023.07.008)
Zhong Q, Xia X, Jiang F (2023) Can green credit facilitate corporate environmental CSR performance? J Manag Sci China 26(03):93–111. https://doi.org/10.19920/j.cnki.jmsc.2023.03.005 . (in Chinese). (PMID: 10.19920/j.cnki.jmsc.2023.03.005)
Zhou K, Wang R, Tao Y, Zheng Y (2022) Firm green transformation and stock price crash risk. J Manag Sci 35(6):14 (in Chinese. CNKI:SUN:JCJJ.0.2022-06-005).
معلومات مُعتمدة: KC-23233796 Yunnan University
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Difference-in-differences model; ESR; Environmental social responsibility; Green finance; Green finance pilot policy
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240819 Date Completed: 20240906 Latest Revision: 20240925
رمز التحديث: 20240926
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-024-34709-5
PMID: 39158660
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1614-7499
DOI:10.1007/s11356-024-34709-5