دورية أكاديمية
[Perineal prostate biopsy].
العنوان: | [Perineal prostate biopsy]. |
---|---|
عنوان ترانسليتريتد: | Perineale Prostatabiopsie. |
المؤلفون: | Pfitzinger PL; Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland. paulo.pfitzinger@med.uni-muenchen.de., Askari DA; Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland., Ivanova T; Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland., Hoffmann M; Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland., Blajan I; Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland., Atzler M; Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland., Stadelmeier LF; Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland., Apfelbeck M; Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland., Chaloupka M; Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland., Kazmierczak P; Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland., Stief C; Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland., Enzinger B; Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland. |
المصدر: | Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) [Urologie] 2024 Sep; Vol. 63 (9), pp. 934-942. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 19. |
نوع المنشور: | Journal Article; Review; English Abstract |
اللغة: | German |
بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Springer Medizin Country of Publication: Germany NLM ID: 9918384886606676 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2731-7072 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 27317064 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Urologie Subsets: MEDLINE |
أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: [Heidelberg, Germany] : Springer Medizin, [2022]- |
مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Perineum*/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms*/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms*/diagnosis , Prostate*/pathology, Humans ; Male ; Biopsy/methods ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods |
مستخلص: | The prostate biopsy is an essential tool for diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa). While transrectal biopsy (TR-Bx) continues to be considered the gold standard in Germany, the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines increasingly recommend transperineal biopsy (TP-Bx) due to lower infection rates and higher tumor detection rates. This article provides an overview of the history and development of the perineal biopsy, compares TR-Bx and TP-Bx and discusses the need for antibiotic prophylaxis before TP-Bx. Current studies have shown that TP-Bx can be performed without antibiotic prophylaxis and new techniques such as robotic-assisted and vector biopsy show very precise results. The establishment of TP-Bx is being promoted by extrabudgetary funding and technological advancements, with the choice of biopsy method remaining an individual decision jointly made in dialogue with the patient. (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.) |
References: | Barringer BS (1922) Carcinoma Of Prostate. Surgery. Gynecol Obstet 34:. Young HH, Davis DM (1926) Young’ Practice of Urology. Based on a Study of 12,500 Cases. South Med J 19:635. (PMID: 10.1097/00007611-192608000-00021) Ferguson RS (1930) Prostatic Neoplasms: Their diagnosis by needle puncture and aspiration. Am J Surg 9:. Peirson EL, Nickerson DA (1943) Biopsy of the prostate with the Silverman Needle. N Engl J Med 228:675–678. (PMID: 10.1056/NEJM194305272282103) Peeling WB, Griffiths GJ, Evans KT et al (1979) Diagnosis and staging of prostatic cancer by transrectal ultrasonography. A preliminary study. Br J Urol 51:565–569. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1979.tb03603.x93975) Hastak SM, Gammelgaard J, Holm HH (1982) Ultrasonically guided transperineal biopsy in the diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma. J Urol 128:69–71. (PMID: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)52760-36180188) Holm HH, Gammelgaard J (1981) Ultrasonically guided precise needle placement in the prostate and the seminal vesicles. J Urol 125:385–387. (PMID: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)55044-27206090) Astraldi A (1937) Diagnosis of cancer of the prostate; biopsy by rectal route. Urol Cutaneous Rev: 421–427. Hodge KK, Mcneal JE, Stamey TA (1989) Ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the palpably abnormal prostate. J Urol 142:66–70. (PMID: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)38663-92659826) Hodge KK, Mcneal JE, Terris MK et al (1989) Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 142:71–74 (discussion 74–75). (PMID: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)38664-02659827) Tu X, Liu Z, Chang T et al (2019) Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy May Perform Better Than Transrectal Route in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer 17:e860–e870. (PMID: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.05.00631281065) Uleri A, Baboudjian M, Tedde A et al (2023) Is There an Impact of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Rate? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol 6:621–628. (PMID: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.08.00137634971) Borghesi M, Ahmed H, Nam R et al (2017) Complications After Systematic, Random, and Image-guided Prostate Biopsy. Eur Urol 71:353–365. (PMID: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.00427543165) Mottet N, Urology EaO (2023) EAU—EANM—ESTRO—ESUR—ISUP—SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Alidjanov JF, Cai T, Bartoletti R et al (2021) The negative aftermath of prostate biopsy: prophylaxis, complications and antimicrobial stewardship: results of the global prevalence study of infections in urology 2010–2019. World J Urol 39:3423–3432. (PMID: 10.1007/s00345-021-03614-8336153938510929) Dyar OJ, Huttner B, Schouten J et al (2017) What is antimicrobial stewardship? Clin Microbiol Infect 23:793–798. (PMID: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.08.02628882725) Pepdjonovic L, Tan GH, Huang S et al (2017) Zero hospital admissions for infection after 577 transperineal prostate biopsies using single-dose cephazolin prophylaxis. World J Urol 35:1199–1203. (PMID: 10.1007/s00345-016-1985-127987032) Gorin MA, Meyer AR, Zimmerman M et al (2020) Transperineal prostate biopsy with cognitive magnetic resonance imaging/biplanar ultrasound fusion: description of technique and early results. World J Urol 38:1943–1949. (PMID: 10.1007/s00345-019-02992-431679065) Hu JC, Assel M, Allaf ME et al (2024) Transperineal versus transrectal magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic prostate biopsy to prevent infectious complications: the PREVENT randomized trial. Eur Urol. Evans R, Loeb A, Kaye KS et al (2017) Infection-Related Hospital Admissions After Prostate Biopsy in United States Men. Open Forum Infect Dis 4:ofw265. (PMID: 10.1093/ofid/ofw265284802585413992) Mian BM, Feustel PJ, Aziz A et al (2024) Complications Following Transrectal and Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: Results of the ProBE-PC Randomized Clinical Trial. J Urol 211:205–213. (PMID: 10.1097/JU.000000000000378837976319) Castellani D, Pirola GM, Law YXT et al (2022) Infection Rate after Transperineal Prostate Biopsy with and without Prophylactic Antibiotics: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies. J Urol 207:25–34. (PMID: 10.1097/JU.000000000000225134555932) Ding XF, Luan Y, Lu SM et al (2021) Risk factors for infection complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided transperineal prostate biopsy. World J Urol 39:2463–2467. (PMID: 10.1007/s00345-020-03454-y32949254) Liss MA, Ehdaie B, Loeb S et al (2017) An Update of the American Urological Association White Paper on the Prevention and Treatment of the More Common Complications Related to Prostate Biopsy. J Urol 198:329–334. (PMID: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.10328363690) Kubo Y, Kawakami S, Numao N et al (2009) Simple and effective local anesthesia for transperineal extended prostate biopsy: application to three-dimensional 26-core biopsy. Int J Urol 16:420–423. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2009.02269.x19416405) Smith JB, Popert R, Nuttall MC et al (2014) Transperineal sector prostate biopsies: a local anesthetic outpatient technique. Urology 83:1344–1349. (PMID: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.02.00824726315) Barzell WE, Whitmore WF (2003) Transperineal template guided saturation biopsy of the prostate: rational, indications and technique. Urol Times 31:41–42. Abdulmajed MI, Hughes D, Shergill IS (2015) The role of transperineal template biopsies of the prostate in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a review. Expert Rev Med Devices 12:175–182. (PMID: 10.1586/17434440.2015.99037625496525) Sivaraman A, Sanchez-Salas R, Ahmed HU et al (2015) Clinical utility of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy of the prostate after negative magnetic resonance imaging-guided transrectal biopsy. Urol Oncol 33:329 e327–329 e311. (PMID: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.005) Dundee PE, Grummet JP, Murphy DG (2015) Transperineal prostate biopsy: template-guided or freehand? BJU Int 115:681–683. (PMID: 10.1111/bju.1286025041087) Grummet J, Pepdjonovic L, Huang S et al (2017) Transperineal vs. transrectal biopsy in MRI targeting. Transl Androl Urol 6:368–375. (PMID: 10.21037/tau.2017.03.58287255785503965) Basourakos SP, Allaway MJ, Ross AE et al (2021) Local anaesthetic techniques for performing transperineal prostate biopsy. Nat Rev Urol 18:315–317. (PMID: 10.1038/s41585-021-00443-733649503) Pfitzinger PL, Enzinger B, Ebner B et al (2023) Transrectal vs. transperineal fusion biopsy of the prostate : Time to switch to the perineal technique-comparison of methods and description of the transperineal procedure under local anesthesia. Urologie 62:473–478. (PMID: 10.1007/s00120-023-02066-936930234) Stefanova V, Buckley R, Flax S et al (2019) Transperineal Prostate Biopsies Using Local Anesthesia: Experience with 1,287 Patients. Prostate Cancer Detection Rate, Complications and Patient Tolerability. J Urol 201:1121–1126. (PMID: 10.1097/JU.000000000000015630835607) Mischinger J, Kaufmann S, Russo GI et al (2018) Targeted vs systematic robot-assisted transperineal magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasonography fusion prostate biopsy. BJU Int 121:791–798. (PMID: 10.1111/bju.1408929211932) Fletcher P, De Santis M, Ippoliti S et al (2023) Vector Prostate Biopsy: A Novel Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Image Fusion Transperineal Biopsy Technique Using Electromagnetic Needle Tracking Under Local Anaesthesia. Eur Urol 83:249–256. (PMID: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.12.00736604276) |
فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Antibiotic prophylaxis; Biopsy method; Local anesthesia; Prostatic neoplasms; Tissue sample Local Abstract: [Publisher, German] Die Prostatabiopsie ist ein essenzielles Werkzeug zur Diagnose eines Prostatakarzinoms (PCa). Während die transrektale Biopsie (TR-Bx) in Deutschland weiterhin als Goldstandard gilt, empfehlen die EAU(European Association of Urology)-Leitlinien zunehmend die transperineale Biopsie (TP-Bx) aufgrund niedrigerer Infektionsraten und höherer Tumordetektionsraten. Dieser Artikel gibt einen Überblick über die Geschichte und Entwicklung der perinealen Biopsie, vergleicht TR- und TP-Bx und diskutiert die Notwendigkeit einer antibiotischen Prophylaxe vor TP-Bx. Aktuelle Studien zeigen, dass TP-Bx ohne antibiotische Prophylaxe durchführbar ist, und neue Techniken wie robotisch assistierte und Vektorbiopsie zeigen sehr präzise Ergebnisse. Die Etablierung der TP-Bx wird durch Extrabudgetierung und technologische Fortschritte vorangetrieben, wobei die Wahl der Biopsiemethode eine individuelle Entscheidung im Dialog mit dem Patienten bleibt. |
تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20240819 Date Completed: 20240823 Latest Revision: 20240823 |
رمز التحديث: | 20240823 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00120-024-02408-1 |
PMID: | 39158686 |
قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
تدمد: | 2731-7072 |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.1007/s00120-024-02408-1 |