دورية أكاديمية
Surgical fixation methods for tibial plateau fractures.
| العنوان: | Surgical fixation methods for tibial plateau fractures. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Smith TO; Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK., Casey L; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, St George's Hospital, London, UK., McNamara IR; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Norfolk and Norwich University NHS Trust, Norwich, UK., Hing CB; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, St George's Hospital, London, UK. |
| المصدر: | The Cochrane database of systematic reviews [Cochrane Database Syst Rev] 2024 Aug 22; Vol. 8. Cochrane AN: CD009679. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 22. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article; Meta-Analysis; Systematic Review |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Wiley Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 100909747 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1469-493X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 13616137 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Publication: 2004- : Chichester, West Sussex, England : Wiley Original Publication: Oxford, U.K. ; Vista, CA : Update Software, |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Fracture Fixation, Internal*/methods , Quality of Life* , Tibial Plateau Fractures*/surgery, Adult ; Humans ; Bias ; Bone Substitutes/therapeutic use ; Intra-Articular Fractures/surgery ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic |
| مستخلص: | Background: Tibial plateau fractures, which are intra-articular injuries of the knee joint, are often difficult to treat and have a high complication rate, including early-onset osteoarthritis. The most common treatment for complex tibial plateau fractures is surgical fixation. Additionally, orthopaedic surgeons often use bone defect fillers to address bone defects caused by the injury. Currently, there is no consensus on the best method of fixation and on whether bone defect fillers are necessary. Objectives: To assess the benefits and harms of different surgical interventions and bone defect fillers for treating tibial plateau fractures. Search Methods: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and trial registries up to March 2023. We also searched conference proceedings and the grey literature. Selection Criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing surgical interventions for treating tibial plateau fractures and different types of filler for bone defects. Data Collection and Analysis: Two review authors independently screened search results, selected studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MDs) or standardised mean differences (SMDs) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Our primary outcomes (and the specific measures we considered most relevant) were generic quality of life (general health score in the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)), patient-reported lower limb function (Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score), and adverse events (frequency of unplanned reoperation). We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence. Main Results: We included 15 trials in the review, with a total of 948 adult participants. Nine trials compared different types of fixation, and six trials evaluated different types of bone graft substitutes. All 15 trials were small and at high risk of bias. We considered most available evidence to be of very low certainty, meaning we have very little confidence in the results. Only limited pooling was possible. One trial compared circular fixation combined with insertion of percutaneous screws (hybrid fixation) versus standard open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in 82 people with open or closed Schatzker types V or VI tibial plateau fractures. At 24 months' follow-up, hybrid fixation compared with ORIF may have little or no effect on SF-36 general health score (MD 6 points higher, 95% CI 7.7 points lower to 19.7 points higher; 66 participants), patient-reported lower limb function according to the HSS score (MD 7 points higher, 95% CI 2.4 points lower to 16.4 points higher; 66 participants), or frequency of unplanned reoperation (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.32; 83 fractures (82 participants)). However, the evidence for all three outcomes is very uncertain. Three trials (with 242 participants) compared single-plating ORIF versus double-plating ORIF. There may be little to know difference in patient-reported lower limb function (HSS score) at 24 months' follow-up in people who undergo single-plating ORIF compared with those who undergo double-plating ORIF (MD 0.2 points higher, 95% CI 2.12 points lower to 2.52 points higher; 1 study, 84 participants), but the evidence is very uncertain. There were no data for quality of life or unplanned reoperation at 24 months' follow-up. Six trials (including 368 participants) compared bone substitute versus autologous bone graft (autograft) for managing bone defects. No trials reported SF-36 general health score, HSS score, or frequency of unplanned reoperation at 24 months' follow-up. Authors' Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence to ascertain the best method of fixation or the best method of addressing bone defects during surgery in people with tibial plateau fractures. Further well-designed RCTs with larger sample sizes are warranted. (Copyright © 2024 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.) |
| التعليقات: | Update of: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 15;(9):CD009679. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009679.pub2. (PMID: 26370268) |
| References: | Orthop Clin North Am. 2002 Jan;33(1):199-209, ix. (PMID: 11832321) Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Dec 15;9(12):23259671211027838. (PMID: 34938818) J South Orthop Assoc. 1997 Spring;6(1):54-61. (PMID: 9090625) J Orthop Trauma. 1999 Aug;13(6):426-31. (PMID: 10459602) J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976 Jun;58(4):453-8. (PMID: 773941) Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979 Jan-Feb;(138):94-104. (PMID: 445923) Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Mar;(240):53-62. (PMID: 2537166) J Orthop Trauma. 2000 Jun-Jul;14(5):339-44. (PMID: 10926241) J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Mar 1;91 Suppl 2 Pt 1:74-88. (PMID: 19255201) BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 8;8(8):e021667. (PMID: 30093519) PLoS One. 2020 Sep 17;15(9):e0232911. (PMID: 32941429) Br J Hosp Med. 1997 Jun 4-17;57(11):582-7. (PMID: 9307681) Bone Joint J. 2015 Jun;97-B(6):836-41. (PMID: 26033066) Indian J Orthop. 2019 May-Jun;53(3):472-478. (PMID: 31080290) Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013 Jan;23(1):97-103. (PMID: 23412414) Injury. 2017 Nov;48 Suppl 5:S61-S64. (PMID: 29122125) J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990 Sep;72(5):801-4. (PMID: 2211760) J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jun 17;16(1):389. (PMID: 34140037) Injury. 2006 Jun;37(6):475-84. (PMID: 16118010) Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2012 Nov;7(3):163-75. (PMID: 23086660) Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2019 Nov 25;32(11):1008-1013. (PMID: 31870048) Int Orthop. 2016 Jul;40(7):1509-14. (PMID: 26231493) Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003 Nov;123(9):489-93. (PMID: 12720016) Technol Health Care. 2022;30(S1):545-551. (PMID: 35124628) Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2021 Sep;55(5):444-456. (PMID: 34730533) J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Oct;90(10):2057-61. (PMID: 18829901) Injury. 2012 Jun;43(6):864-9. (PMID: 22169068) Orthopedics. 2015 Sep;38(9):e780-6. (PMID: 26375535) J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Feb;22(2):126-30; discussion 130-1. (PMID: 18349781) Trials. 2014 Mar 08;15:75. (PMID: 24606670) Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Aug;22(8):952-5. (PMID: 18773812) Malays Orthop J. 2012 Mar;6(1):7-12. (PMID: 25279035) Orthop Rev. 1994 Feb;23(2):149-54. (PMID: 8196973) Ir J Med Sci. 2012 Jun;181(2):247-52. (PMID: 22228265) J Trauma. 2004 Aug;57(2):340-6. (PMID: 15345983) J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998 Jan;80(1):63-9. (PMID: 9460955) J Orthop Trauma. 1994;8(3):183-8. (PMID: 8027885) J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Feb 5;102(3):179-193. (PMID: 31809394) ISRN Orthop. 2014 Mar 16;2014:324573. (PMID: 24967126) BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 3;9(8):e026962. (PMID: 31481365) J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Jan;32 Suppl 1:S1-S170. (PMID: 29256945) J Indian Med Assoc. 2013 Dec;111(12):804-5. (PMID: 25154147) Radiographics. 2021 Jan-Feb;41(1):144-155. (PMID: 33275542) Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2016 Sep;7(3):126-34. (PMID: 27551570) Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Mar;27(3):837-844. (PMID: 30159740) J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2011 Apr;22(4):1073-80. (PMID: 21431354) Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Nov;(248):13-4. (PMID: 2805470) Knee. 2015 Jun;22(3):225-9. (PMID: 25747747) Orthop Rev. 1992 Dec;21(12):1433-6. (PMID: 1465305) Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 15;(9):CD009679. (PMID: 26370268) Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83. (PMID: 1593914) J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Aug;88(8):1713-21. (PMID: 16882892) Orthopade. 2004 Aug;33(8):919-27. (PMID: 15138676) Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Jul;24(5):647-53. (PMID: 23801029) Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2009 Dec;21(6):620-35. (PMID: 20087722) Knee. 2008 Mar;15(2):139-43. (PMID: 18215801) J Orthop Trauma. 2003 Aug;17(7):496-502. (PMID: 12902787) Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Oct;25(10):1201-4. (PMID: 22069974) J Orthop Trauma. 1987;1(2):97-119. (PMID: 3333518) Orthopedics. 2009 Aug;32(8):. (PMID: 19708633) J Orthop Trauma. 2002 Oct;16(9):628-31. (PMID: 12368642) Orthopedics. 2012 Mar 07;35(3):e359-64. (PMID: 22385447) J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Dec;88(12):2613-23. (PMID: 17142411) Bone Jt Open. 2022 Mar;3(3):218-228. (PMID: 35285251) Injury. 2005 Jan;36(1):178-84. (PMID: 15589938) Can J Surg. 2008 Oct;51(5):378-82. (PMID: 18841234) Phys Ther. 1999 Apr;79(4):371-83. (PMID: 10201543) J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2011;21(2):139-48. (PMID: 22043972) |
| سلسلة جزيئية: | ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00409799 |
| المشرفين على المادة: | 0 (Bone Substitutes) |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20240822 Date Completed: 20240822 Latest Revision: 20240927 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20240927 |
| مُعرف محوري في PubMed: | PMC11339927 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/14651858.CD009679.pub3 |
| PMID: | 39171616 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 1469-493X |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1002/14651858.CD009679.pub3 |