دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Cross-cultural adaptation of the empowerment scale of pregnant women in China context: An integrative method of translation and linguistic validation.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Cross-cultural adaptation of the empowerment scale of pregnant women in China context: An integrative method of translation and linguistic validation.
المؤلفون: Liu Y; Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia., Che CC; Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia., Hamdan M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia., Chong MC; Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
المصدر: Nursing open [Nurs Open] 2024 Sep; Vol. 11 (9), pp. e70017.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101675107 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2054-1058 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20541058 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Nurs Open Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: [Hoboken, NJ] : John Wiley & Sons, Inc., [2014]-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Pregnant Women*/psychology , Pregnant Women*/ethnology , Empowerment* , Psychometrics*/instrumentation , Psychometrics*/methods, Humans ; Female ; Pregnancy ; China ; Adult ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Reproducibility of Results ; Cross-Cultural Comparison ; Delphi Technique ; Translations ; Translating ; Linguistics
مستخلص: Aim: To translate the Empowerment Scale for Pregnant Women (ESPW) into Chinese and to assess its linguistic validity.
Methods: The integrative method of the translation process, the Delphi technique, and cognitive interviews were used to implement cross-cultural adaptation and enhance comprehensibility and linguistic validation. This study recruited 14 experts in the expert review and cognitively reviewed 15 pregnant women.
Results: The two-round Delphi method created agreement on cultural applicability. The results of content validity achieved good levels: The item-level content validity index (CVI) ranged from 0.78 to 1.00, and the scale-level content validity index, calculated using two different formulas, were 0.97 and 0.81, respectively. Kappa values ranged from 0.74 to 1.00. Pregnant women could understand most of the items and response options in the cognitive interview. The revisions to the wording were made based on suggestions from experts and pregnant women.
Conclusion: The prefinal simplified Chinese ESPW was semantically and conceptually equivalent to the English version, which was well prepared for further psychometric tests in the next stage of cross-cultural adaptation.
Patient or Public Contribution: This comprehensive method successfully developed a Chinese tool to measure the empowerment of pregnant women, indicating the international applicability of this tool and the methodological scientific nature. The simplified Chinese ESPW has the potential to support the identification of empowerment levels of pregnant women and the evaluation of the effectiveness of health education and promotion programmes.
(© 2024 The Author(s). Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
References: Midwifery. 2024 Jul;134:104002. (PMID: 38669756)
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91. (PMID: 11124735)
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;68(4):435-41. (PMID: 25698408)
Appl Nurs Res. 2018 Feb;39:11-17. (PMID: 29422144)
J Adv Nurs. 2004 Oct;48(2):175-86. (PMID: 15369498)
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jul 08;13:263. (PMID: 23835131)
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Sep 22;20(1):555. (PMID: 32962637)
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Nov 17;20(1):246. (PMID: 34789249)
BMC Womens Health. 2014 Sep 15;14:111. (PMID: 25220577)
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2023 Nov;55(6):1268-1279. (PMID: 37212367)
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):462-74. (PMID: 26584737)
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 13;22(1):396. (PMID: 35698043)
Nurs Open. 2024 Sep;11(9):e70017. (PMID: 39279598)
West J Nurs Res. 2003 Aug;25(5):508-18. (PMID: 12955968)
J Pediatr Nurs. 2022 May-Jun;64:e32-e39. (PMID: 35101353)
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(2):155-64. (PMID: 17535316)
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Apr;103(4):777-787. (PMID: 31767243)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 05;17(21):. (PMID: 33167397)
Value Health. 2005 Mar-Apr;8(2):94-104. (PMID: 15804318)
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Sep 11;20(1):526. (PMID: 32912254)
Pain Manag Nurs. 2019 Dec;20(6):549-555. (PMID: 31447300)
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Sep;153:104534. (PMID: 34332469)
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jun 3;23(1):531. (PMID: 35658927)
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Apr 22;22(1):351. (PMID: 35459098)
Ther Adv Reprod Health. 2021 Aug 6;15:26334941211031866. (PMID: 34396131)
Res Nurs Health. 2007 Aug;30(4):459-67. (PMID: 17654487)
Midwifery. 2019 Nov;78:1-7. (PMID: 31325736)
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1159-1170. (PMID: 29550964)
Electron Physician. 2016 Sep 20;8(9):2962-2969. (PMID: 27790351)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Delphi method; cognitive interviewing; content validity; empowerment; pregnant women
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240916 Date Completed: 20240916 Latest Revision: 20240924
رمز التحديث: 20240924
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC11403275
DOI: 10.1002/nop2.70017
PMID: 39279598
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:2054-1058
DOI:10.1002/nop2.70017