دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Comparison of Franseen and novel tricore needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy in a porcine liver model.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Comparison of Franseen and novel tricore needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy in a porcine liver model.
المؤلفون: Park Y; Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.; Department of Convergence Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea., Kang JM; Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea., Kim JW; Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea., Won DS; Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.; Department of Convergence Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea., Ryu DS; Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea., Kim SH; Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.; Department of Convergence Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea., Yun CE; Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea., Eo SJ; Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.; Department of Convergence Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea., Park JH; Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea. jhparkz@amc.seoul.kr.; Department of Convergence Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea. jhparkz@amc.seoul.kr., Lee SS; Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea. euslove68@gmail.com.
المصدر: Scientific reports [Sci Rep] 2024 Sep 28; Vol. 14 (1), pp. 22453. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 28.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article; Comparative Study
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Nature Publishing Group Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101563288 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2045-2322 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20452322 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Sci Rep Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: London : Nature Publishing Group, copyright 2011-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration*/instrumentation , Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration*/methods , Liver*/pathology , Liver*/diagnostic imaging , Needles*, Animals ; Swine ; Male ; Equipment Design
مستخلص: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy is an effective method for obtaining tissue samples from various organs; however, challenges such as inadequate specimens persist. This study compared a newly designed Tricore needle with a Franseen needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy of porcine liver. Both needles were tested on four male Yorkshire pigs. Specimens were obtained with an 100% (36/36) success rate with no procedure-related adverse effects. The Tricore needle experienced significantly less resistance during puncture than Franseen needle (3.83 vs. 5.97 N, P < 0.001) and better ultrasound visibility (168.97 vs. 125.04, P = 0.004). The Tricore needle also achieved faster specimen acquisition time (48.94 vs. 59.90 s, P = 0.038), larger total specimen area (6.67 vs. 4.68 mm 2 , P = 0.049), fewer fragments (23.94 vs. 31.94, P = 0.190), lager fragment area (0.28 vs. 0.15 mm 2 , P < 0.001), and more the number of complete portal tracts (15.44 vs. 9.33, P = 0.017) compared to the Franseen needle. The newly designed Tricore needle showed enhanced procedural performance and specimen quantity and quality compared to commercially available Franseen needle. Although further clinical studies are required, the Tricore needle may represent a favorable option for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy procedures.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)
References: Mohan, B. P. et al. Comparison of Franseen and fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid mass lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc. Ultrasound. 8, 382–391. https://doi.org/10.4103/eus.eus&#95;27&#95;19 (2019). (PMID: 10.4103/eus.eus_27_19312491636927147)
Tanisaka, Y. et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and Biopsy device for Lymphadenopathy. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract.2021(6640862). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6640862 (2021).
Gheorghiu, M. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of focal liver lesions: prospective head-to-head comparison. Diagnostics (Basel). 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12092214 (2022).
Levine, I. & Trindade, A. J. Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration vs fine needle biopsy for pancreatic masses, subepithelial lesions, and lymph nodes. World J. Gastroenterol.27, 4194–4207. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i26.4194 (2021). (PMID: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i26.4194343266198311529)
Song, T. J. et al. The prospective randomized, controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22G and 19G aspiration needles for solid pancreatic or peripancreatic masses. Am. J. Gastroenterol.105, 1739–1745. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2010.108 (2010). (PMID: 10.1038/ajg.2010.10820216532)
Oh, D. et al. A comparison between 25-gauge and 22-gauge Franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic and peripancreatic masses: a randomized non-inferiority study. Endoscopy. 53, 1122–1129. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1369-8610 (2021). (PMID: 10.1055/a-1369-861033652495)
Lee, W. J., Uradomo, L. T., Zhang, Y., Twaddell, W. & Darwin, P. Comparison of the Diagnostic yield of EUS needles for Liver Biopsy: Ex vivo study. Diagn. Ther. Endosc. 2017(1497831). https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1497831 (2017).
Eskandari, A., Koo, P., Bang, H., Gui, D. & Urayama, S. Comparison of endoscopic Ultrasound Biopsy needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy. Clin. Endosc. 52, 347–352. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.005 (2019). (PMID: 10.5946/ce.2019.005312885046680021)
Facciorusso, A. et al. Diagnostic yield of Franseen and Fork-Tip biopsy needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition: A meta-analysis. Endosc. Int. Open.7, E1221–E1230. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0982-2997 (2019). (PMID: 10.1055/a-0982-2997315797036773615)
Zhu, X. et al. Method for Calculating the Bending Angle of Puncture Needle in Preoperative Planning for Transjugular Intrahepatic Portal Systemic Shunt (TIPS). Comput. Math. Methods Med. 4534579. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4534579 (2018).
Hamidian Jahromi, A., Ballard, D. H., Bahrami, R. & D’Agostino, H. R. Comparison of different techniques of Ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy of liver in a swine model. Hepat. Mon. 15, e26439. https://doi.org/10.5812/hepatmon.26439v2 (2015). (PMID: 10.5812/hepatmon.26439v2262886334533130)
Charan, J. & Kantharia, N. D. How to calculate sample size in animal studies? J. Pharmacol. Pharmacother. 4, 303–306. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.119726 (2013). (PMID: 10.4103/0976-500X.119726242502143826013)
Takatani, J., Takeshima, N., Okuda, K., Uchino, T. & Noguchi, T. Ultrasound visibility of regional anesthesia catheters: an in vitro study. Korean J. Anesthesiol. 63, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2012.63.1.59 (2012). (PMID: 10.4097/kjae.2012.63.1.59228703673408517)
Itoi, T. et al. Experimental endoscopy: objective evaluation of EUS needles. Gastrointest. Endosc. 69, 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2008.07.017 (2009). (PMID: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.07.01719231491)
Levy, M. J., Jondal, M. L., Clain, J. & Wiersema, M. J. Preliminary experience with an EUS-guided trucut biopsy needle compared with EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest. Endosc. 57, 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1067/mge.2003.49 (2003). (PMID: 10.1067/mge.2003.4912518144)
Matsunami, Y. et al. Objective evaluation of the resistance forces of 22-gauge EUS-FNA and fine-needle biopsy needles. Endosc Ultrasound. 12, 251–258. https://doi.org/10.4103/EUS-D-22-00059 (2023). (PMID: 10.4103/EUS-D-22-000593714813710237597)
Mavrogenis, G. et al. 25-gauge histology needle versus 22-gauge cytology needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions and lymphadenopathy. Endosc Int. Open.3, E63–68. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1390889 (2015). (PMID: 10.1055/s-0034-139088926134775)
Obaitan, I., Saxena, R. & Al-Haddad, M. A. EUS guided Liver Biopsy. Tech. Innov. Gastrointest. Endosc. 24, 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tige.2021.09.002 (2022). (PMID: 10.1016/j.tige.2021.09.002)
Kawai, N. et al. Evaluation of vascular puncture needles with specific modifications for enhanced ultrasound visibility: In vitro study. World J. Radiol.4, 273–277. https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v4.i6.273 (2012). (PMID: 10.4329/wjr.v4.i6.273227788803391673)
Rominger, M. B. et al. Ultrasound Needle visibility in contrast Mode Imaging: an in Vitro and Ex vivo study. Ultrasound Int. Open.3, E82–e88. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-101511 (2017). (PMID: 10.1055/s-0043-101511286530455482181)
Brasileiro, A. C. L. et al. Needle visualization during ultrasound-guided puncture: Image optimization. J. Vasc Bras.22, e20230038. https://doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.202300382 (2023). (PMID: 10.1590/1677-5449.2023003823757673610421575)
Sanchez-Margallo, J. A. et al. Block-matching-based registration to evaluate ultrasound visibility of percutaneous needles in liver-mimicking phantoms. Med. Phys.48, 7602–7612. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.15305 (2021). (PMID: 10.1002/mp.1530534665885)
Reusz, G., Sarkany, P., Gal, J. & Csomos, A. Needle-related ultrasound artifacts and their importance in anaesthetic practice. Br. J. Anaesth.112, 794–802. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aet585 (2014). (PMID: 10.1093/bja/aet58524566811)
van de Berg, N. J., Sánchez-Margallo, J. A., van Dijke, A. P., Langø, T. & van den Dobbelsteen, J. J. A methodical quantification of needle visibility and echogenicity in Ultrasound images. Ultrasound. Med. Biol.45, 998–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.10.004 (2019). (PMID: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.10.00430655111)
Huang, J. et al. Imaging artifacts of medical instruments in ultrasound-guided interventions. J. Ultrasound Med.26, 1303–1322. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2007.26.10.1303 (2007). (PMID: 10.7863/jum.2007.26.10.130317901134)
Fajardo, D. A. & Epstein, J. I. Fragmentation of prostatic needle biopsy cores containing adenocarcinoma: The role of specimen submission. BJU Int.105, 172–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08737.x (2010). (PMID: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08737.x19583726)
Hashimoto, R. et al. Comparison of two Specialized Histology needles for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-Guided liver biopsy: A pilot study. Dig. Dis. Sci.66, 1700–1706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06391-3 (2021). (PMID: 10.1007/s10620-020-06391-332556821)
Takahashi, K. et al. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of solid pancreatic tumors with 3 versus 12 to-and-fro movements: A multicenter prospective randomized controlled study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 97, 1092–1099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2023.01.037 (2023). (PMID: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.01.03736702383)
معلومات مُعتمدة: RS-2023-00238092 Korea Medical Device Development Fund; Supporting Projects to Evaluate New Domestic Medical Devices in Hospitals Ministry of Health and Welfare and the Korea Health Industry Development Institute
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Animal model; Endoscopic ultrasonography; Fine-needle biopsy; Image-guided biopsy; Liver
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240928 Date Completed: 20240929 Latest Revision: 20240928
رمز التحديث: 20240929
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-73184-3
PMID: 39341878
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-73184-3