التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Application and comparison of different implanted ports in malignant tumor patients. |
| المؤلفون: |
Yanhong Li, Yonghua Cai, Xiaoqin Gan, Xinmei Ye, Jiayu Ling, Liang Kang, Junwen Ye, Xingwei Zhang, Jianwei Zhang, Yue Cai, Huabin Hu, Meijin Huang, Yanhong Deng |
| المصدر: |
World Journal of Surgical Oncology; 9/23/2016, Vol. 14, p1-6, 6p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
CANCER patients, JUGULAR vein, SUBCLAVIAN veins, GASTROINTESTINAL cancer, PERIOPERATIVE care |
| مستخلص: |
Background: The current study aims to compare the application and convenience of the upper arm port with the other two methods of implanted ports in the jugular vein and the subclavian vein in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Methods: Currently, the standard of practice is placement of central venous access via an internal jugular vein approach. Perioperative time, postoperative complications, and postoperative comfort level in patients receiving an implanted venous port in the upper arm were retrospectively compared to those in the jugular vein and the subclavian vein from April 2013 to November 2014. Results: Three hundred thirty-four patients are recruited for this analysis, consisting of 107 in the upper arm vein group, 70 in the jugular vein group, and 167 in the subclavian vein group. The occurrence of catheter misplacement in the upper arm vein is higher than that in the other two groups (13.1 vs. 2.9 vs. 5.4%, respectively, P = 0.02), while the other complications in the perioperative period were not significantly different. The occurrence of transfusion obstacle of the upper arm vein group is significantly lower than that of the jugular and subclavian groups (0.9 vs. 7.1 vs. 7.2%, P = 0.01). The occurrence of thrombus is also lower than that of other two groups (0.9 vs. 4.3 vs. 3.6%, P = 0.03). Regarding the postoperative comfort, the influences of appearance (0 vs. 7.1 vs. 2.9%, P = 0.006) and sleep (0.9 vs. 4.2 vs. 10.7%, P = 0.003) are significantly better than those of the jugular and subclavian vein groups. Conclusions: Compared to the jugular and the subclavian vein groups, the implanted venous port in the upper arm vein has fewer complications and more convenience and comfort, and might be a superior novel choice for patients requiring long-term chemotherapy or parenteral nutrition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of World Journal of Surgical Oncology is the property of BioMed Central and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
Find this article in full text from Springer Verlag. 
Full Text Finder