التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
On the Good in Aristotle and Early Buddhism: A Response to Abraham Vélez. |
| المؤلفون: |
Keown, Damien |
| المصدر: |
Journal of Buddhist Ethics; 2017, Vol. 24, p97-115, 19p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
BUDDHIST doctrines, Early Period, to ca. 250 B.C., ARISTOTELIANISM (Philosophy) |
| مستخلص: |
In an earlier publication I compared Aristotelian and Buddhist concepts of the consummate good. Abraham Vélez de Cea has claimed I misrepresent the nature of the good by restricting it to certain psychic states and excluding a range of other goods acknowledged by Aristotle and the Buddha. My aim here is to show that my understanding of the good is not the narrow one Vélez suggests. The article concludes with some observations on the relationship between moral and non-moral good in Buddhism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Journal of Buddhist Ethics is the property of Daniel Geoffrey Cozort and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
