دورية أكاديمية

Prophylactic ulinastatin administration for preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: A meta-analysis.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Prophylactic ulinastatin administration for preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: A meta-analysis.
المؤلفون: KUN ZHU, JIAN-PING WANG, JIN-GEN SU
المصدر: Experimental & Therapeutic Medicine; Oct2017, Vol. 14 Issue 4, p3036-3056, 21p
مصطلحات موضوعية: PANCREATITIS treatment, URINARY trypsin inhibitor, ENDOSCOPIC retrograde cholangiopancreatography, META-analysis, DISEASE incidence
مستخلص: The objective of the present study was to perform a meta-analysis of all available studies on the effect of prophylactic ulinastatin administration on preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP). The PubMed, Web of Knowledge and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched to identify all relevant studies published in English or Chinese prior to April 2016. Cochrane Review Manager was used to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) to determine the effect of prophylactic ulinastatin on PEP, post-ERCP hyperamylasemia (PEHA) and post-ERCP abdominal pain. The analysis revealed that prophylactic ulinastatin administration significantly reduced the PEP risk (RR=0.49; 95% CI: 0.33-0.74; P=0.0006; I²=24); however, such significant risk reduction occurred only in patients with low or average risk for PEP and high-dosage ulinastatin (150,000 or 200,000 U) administration, and when the ulinastatin administration began prior to or during ERCP. Pre-ERCP ulinastatin administration alone without additional administration after ERCP was sufficient. Prophylactic ulinastatin also significantly reduced the PEHA risk (RR=0.68; 95% CI: 0.56-0.83; P=0.0001; I²=19) and marginally reduced the incidence of post-ERCP abdominal pain (RR=0.67; 95% CI: 0.45-1.00; P=0.05; I²=67). In conclusion, prophylactic ulinastatin administration significantly reduced the risk of PEP in patients with low or average risk for PEP when administered at a high dosage prior to or during ERCP. High-quality studies, particularly on high-risk patients, are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Experimental & Therapeutic Medicine is the property of Spandidos Publications UK Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:17920981
DOI:10.3892/etm.2017.4910