دورية أكاديمية

Primary vs myocutaneous flap closure of perineal defects following abdominoperineal resection for colorectal disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Primary vs myocutaneous flap closure of perineal defects following abdominoperineal resection for colorectal disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis.
المؤلفون: Yang, XY., Wei, MT., Yang, XT., He, YZ., Hao, Y., Zhang, XB., Deng, XB., Wang, ZQ., Zhou, ZQ.
المصدر: Colorectal Disease; Feb2019, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p138-155, 18p
مصطلحات موضوعية: ABDOMINOPERINEAL resection, SURGICAL complications, MUSCULOCUTANEOUS flaps, WOUND healing, SYSTEMATIC reviews, META-analysis
مستخلص: Aim: Perineal wound complications after abdominoperineal resection (APR) have become a major clinical challenge. Myocutaneous flap closure has been proposed in place of primary closure to improve wound healing. We conducted this comprehensive meta‐analysis to evaluate the current scientific evidence of primary closure vs myocutaneous flap closure of perineal defects following APR for colorectal disease. Methods: We systematically searched the MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases to identify all relevant studies. After data extraction from the included studies, meta‐analysis was performed to compare perioperative outcomes of primary closure and myocutaneous flap closure. Results: Eighteen studies with a total of 17 913 patients (16 346 primary closure vs 1567 myocutaneous flap closure) were included. We found that primary closure was significantly associated with higher total perineal wound complications (P = 0.007), major perineal wound complications (P < 0.001) and perineal wound infection (P = 0.001). On the other hand, myocutaneous flap closure takes more operation time (P < 0.001) and increases the risk of perineal wound dehiscence (P = 0.01), deep surgical site infection (P < 0.001), enterocutaneous fistulas (P = 0.03) and return to the operating room (P = 0.0005). There were no significant differences between the two groups for other outcomes. Conclusions: This is the first systematic review with meta‐analysis comparing primary closure with myocutaneous flap closure of perineal defects after APR for colorectal disease. Although taking more operation time and an increased risk of specific complications, the pooled results have validated the use of myocutaneous flaps for reducing total/major perineal wound complications. More investigations are needed to draw definitive conclusions on this dilemma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Colorectal Disease is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:14628910
DOI:10.1111/codi.14471