دورية أكاديمية

Incidence of severe critical events in paediatric anaesthesia in the United Kingdom: secondary analysis of the anaesthesia practice in children observational trial (APRICOT study).

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Incidence of severe critical events in paediatric anaesthesia in the United Kingdom: secondary analysis of the anaesthesia practice in children observational trial (APRICOT study).
المؤلفون: Engelhardt, T., Ayansina, D., Bell, G. T., Oshan, V., Rutherford, J. S., Morton, N. S., APRICOT Group of the European Society of Anaesthesiology Clinical Trial Network
المصدر: Anaesthesia; Mar2019, Vol. 74 Issue 3, p300-311, 12p, 6 Charts, 3 Graphs
مصطلحات موضوعية: APRICOT, SECONDARY analysis, ANESTHESIA, EVIDENCE-based management, TRAINING of executives, CHILDREN, PERIOPERATIVE care, RESEARCH, PEDIATRIC anesthesia, RESEARCH methodology, DISEASE incidence, CARDIOVASCULAR diseases, EVALUATION research, RESPIRATORY organ sounds, COMPARATIVE studies, QUALITY assurance, RESEARCH funding, LONGITUDINAL method, BRONCHIAL spasm
مصطلحات جغرافية: UNITED Kingdom
الشركة/الكيان: AMERICAN Standards Association
مستخلص: The anaesthesia practice in children observational trial of 31,127 patients in 261 European hospitals revealed a high (5.2%) incidence of severe critical events in the peri-operative period and wide variability in practice. A sub-analysis of the UK data was undertaken to investigate differences compared with the non-UK cohort in the incidence and nature of peri-operative severe critical events and to attempt to identify areas for quality improvement. In the UK cohort of 7040 paediatric patients from 43 hospitals, the overall incidence of peri-operative severe critical events was lower than in the non-UK cohort (3.3%, 95%CI: 2.9-3.8 vs. 5.8%, 95%CI: 5.5-6.1, RR 0.57, p < 0.001). There was a lower rate of bronchospasm (RR 0.22, 95%CI: 0.14-0.33; p < 0.001), stridor (RR 0.42, 95%CI: 0.28-0.65; p < 0.001) and cardiovascular instability (RR 0.69, 95%CI: 0.55-0.86; p = 0.001) than in the non-UK cohort. The proportion of sicker patients where less experienced teams were managing care was lower in the UK than in the non-UK cohort (10.4% vs. 20.4% of the ASA physical status 3 and 9% vs. 12.9% of the ASA physical status 4 patients). Differences in work-load between centres did not affect the incidence and outcomes of severe critical events when stratified for age and ASA physical status. The lower incidence of cardiovascular and respiratory complications could be partly attributed to more experienced dedicated paediatric anaesthesia providers managing the higher risk patients in the UK. Areas for quality improvement include: standardisation of serious critical event definitions; increased reporting; development of evidence-based protocols for management of serious critical events; development and rational use of paediatric peri-operative risk assessment scores; implementation of current best practice in provision of competent paediatric anaesthesia services in Europe; development of specific training in the management of severe peri-operative critical events; and implementation of systems for ensuring maintenance of skills. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Anaesthesia is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:00032409
DOI:10.1111/anae.14520