التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: |
TEAM EFFECTIVENESS: A STUDY ON TEACHERS IN HIGHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS IN KERALA. |
المؤلفون: |
S., Jose, S., Ajith, Nair, Lekshmi V. |
المصدر: |
Loyola Journal of Social Sciences; Jan-Jun2018, Vol. 32 Issue 1, p65-83, 19p |
مصطلحات موضوعية: |
TEACHER education, TEAMS in the workplace, EMPLOYEES, UNIVERSITIES & colleges, SELF-efficacy |
مصطلحات جغرافية: |
KERALA (India) |
مستخلص: |
Teamwork is the concept of people working together cooperatively. Industrial organisations are apparently very conscious of the need to teamwork; this is not the case of the Higher Educational Institutions (HEIs). The present study attempts to explore team effectiveness in the context of HEIs in South India. The study adopted a Multi-stage Sampling, with a selection process done in four phases and took a mixed method approach. The first phase, involved the selection of an HEI (College/University Department) from each of the Universities - Kerala, MG & Calicut, using the lottery method from each region - North, Central and South. Having selected the college/institution, a list of the various departments under the two disciplines - arts and sciences - was compiled during the second phase. From the sampling frame compiled, a department representing each of the disciplines was randomly selected and the entire teaching staff was interviewed for the purpose of eliciting data. A total of 164 teachers were covered as a part of the study. The framework proposed by Udai Pareek (2002) describes Team Effectiveness along two dimensions-empowerment (task-specific strategies and processes) and functioning (the social experience), each of which having several sub-dimensions. Team Empowerment encompassed four subdimensions - task clarity, autonomy, support, and accountability, while Team Functioning was measured along three dimensions - cohesion, confrontation, and collaboration. It was found that subdimensions - task clarity, support, accountability, cohesion, confrontation and collaboration were found to vary across the type of institutions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Loyola Journal of Social Sciences is the property of Loyola Journal of Social Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |