التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
CONDITIONAL DEFERRAL (AND WITHDRAWAL ) OF CRIMINAL PROSECUTION FROM NATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LEGAL PERSPECTIVE. |
| Alternate Title: |
UVJETNA ODGODA (I ODUSTANAK) OD KAZNENOG PROGONA U NACIONALNOJ I KOMPARATIVNO PRAVNOJ PERSPEKTIVI. (Croatian) |
| المؤلفون: |
Burić, Zoran, Pleić, Marija, Radić, Ivana |
| المصدر: |
Pravni Vjesnik; 2021, Vol. 37 Issue 1, p83-104, 22p |
| Abstract (English): |
Conditional deferral (and withdrawal) of criminal prosecution is a typical institution of negotiated criminal justice. It is usually applied in relation to less serious criminal offences with the aim to relieve the court system workload and humanise the treatment of the offender. This institution was introduced into the Croatian criminal justice system more than 20 years ago. Despite such a long presence within the system, it has never acquired the status of an important and widely applied institution. Quite the contrary, its application in practice is quite scarce. In order to identify possible reasons for this at the normative level, the authors have undertaken a comparative legal analysis of said institution. Main characteristics of conditional deferral (and withdrawal) of criminal prosecution in Croatia have been compared with the main characteristics of identical or equivalent institutions in five other jurisdictions: Austria, Germany, Italy, England, and France. Special attention has been devoted to five highlighted issues: the goal(s) of the institution, the offences in relation to which it may be applied, the role of the court, the rights of the defendant, and the position of the victim. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Abstract (Croatian): |
Uvjetna odgoda (i odustanak) od kaznenog progona tipičan je konsenzualni institut u kaznenom postupku. Obično se primjenjuje u odnosu na lakša kaznena djela s ciljem smanjenja opterećenja sudova i humanizacije postupanja prema počinitelju. Iako je uveden u hrvatski kaznenopravni sustav prije više od 20 godina, nikada nije stekao status važne i široko primjenjivane institucije. Upravo suprotno, u praksi se uvjetna odgoda kaznenog progona gotovo uopće ne primjenjuje. Kako bi identificirali moguće razloge za to na normativnoj razini, autori su proveli poredbenopravnu analizu navedenog instituta. Glavne karakteristike uvjetne odgode kaznenog progona u Republici Hrvatskoj uspoređene su s glavnim obilježjima identičnih ili ekvivalentnih instituta u pet drugih komparativnih pravnih sustava: austrijskom, njemačkom, talijanskom, engleskom, i francuskom. Posebna pozornost u radu posvećena je analizi pet istaknutih pitanja: ciljevima ovog instituta, kaznenim djelima na koja se može primijeniti, ulozi suda, pravima okrivljenika i položaju žrtve. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Pravni Vjesnik is the property of Pravni fakultet Sveucilista J. J. Strossmayera u Osijeku and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
Full Text Finder