التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
THE CASE FOR BASIC INCOME EXPERIMENTS. |
| المؤلفون: |
Castro, Amy, West, Stacia |
| المصدر: |
Journal of Policy Analysis & Management; Mar2022, Vol. 41 Issue 2, p639-644, 6p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
BASIC income, POLITICAL science, BEHAVIORAL sciences, PUBLIC opinion, GOVERNMENT policy, HOUSING policy, SHAME |
| مستخلص: |
Terms such as universal basic income, basic income, and guaranteed income are used when appropriate. Given that policy implementation success rests, in part, on nuanced understanding of complex local systems (Hudson, Hunter, & Peckham, 2019), building permanent, robust support for effective unconditional cash policies requires attention to empirical gaps. The policy choices made by the United States when responding to the Great Depression and the COVID-19 pandemic illustrate how policy failures exacerbate accumulated inequality, causing the policy gaps of the past to generate inequality in the present. The pandemic has accelerated the policy discourse on unconditional cash, conflating decades of universal basic income (UBI) advocacy and research with other unconditional transfers such as guaranteed income (GI), basic income, or one-time stimulus payments. [Extracted from the article] |
|
Copyright of Journal of Policy Analysis & Management is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
Full Text Finder