التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: |
El código orgánico integral penal y el procedimiento del dictamen abstentivo ante el desamparo de las víctimas. (Spanish) |
Alternate Title: |
The criminal integral organic code and the procedure of the abstention opinion before the abandonment of the victims. (English) |
المؤلفون: |
Calva Vega, Yolanda Guissell, Rojas Sotomayor, Francisco Xavier, Montecé Giler, Salomón Alejandro |
المصدر: |
Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores; 2022 Special Issue, Vol. 10, p1-23, 23p |
مصطلحات موضوعية: |
JUDGES, PROSECUTION, CRIMINAL codes, CRIMINALS, VICTIMS, CRIME |
Abstract (English): |
The objective of the study is to determine the violation of the conventional, constitutional, and procedural guarantees of the victims, through the application of the third paragraph of article 600 COIP; Therefore, an abstention opinion must be presented when the crime has a sentence of less than fifteen years in prison and there is no private accusation. The methodologies used were analytical, synthetic, inductive, deductive, as well as the expert method, documentary analysis, interview, and survey. The investigation concludes that with the abstentional opinion of the prosecution for infractions with sentences of less than fifteen years, the right to challenge and effective protection is violated. This makes it impossible and conditions the judge of criminal guarantees to be able to assume a criterion that does not belong to him. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
Abstract (Spanish): |
El objetivo del estudio es Determinar la vulneración de las garantías convencionales, constitucionales y procesales de las víctimas, a través de la aplicación del inciso tercero del artículo 600 COIP; por lo que debe presentarse un dictamen abstentivo cuando el delito tenga una pena inferior a quince años de prisión y no exista acusación particular. Las metodologías utilizadas fueron analítica, sintética, inductiva, deductiva, así como método de expertos, análisis documental, la entrevista y la encuesta. La investigación concluye que con el dictamen abstentivo de la fiscalía por infracciones con penas inferiores a quince años, se transgrede el derecho a la impugnación y a la tutela efectiva. Esto imposibilita y condiciona al juez de garantías penales para poder asumir un criterio que no le pertenece. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores is the property of Dilemas Contemporaneos: Educacion, Politica y Valores and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |