التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Measurement of Mobility and Physical Function in Patients Hospitalized With Hip Fracture: A Systematic Review of Instruments and Their Measurement Properties. |
| المؤلفون: |
Rix, Alana, Lawrence, Drew, Raper, Eleanor, Calthorpe, Sara, Holland, Anne E, Kimmel, Lara A |
| المصدر: |
PTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal; Jan2023, Vol. 103 Issue 1, p1-12, 12p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
CINAHL database, PREDICTIVE tests, MEDICAL information storage & retrieval systems, RESEARCH evaluation, SYSTEMATIC reviews, HIP fractures, HEALTH outcome assessment, HOSPITAL care, PHYSICAL mobility, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, MEDLINE |
| مستخلص: |
Objective Hip fractures are common and significantly impact mobility and physical function. Measurement of patient progress post hip fracture in the acute hospital setting is important to monitor early recovery and outcomes. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the measurement properties (reliability, validity, responsiveness), interpretability, and clinical utility of instruments used to measure mobility and physical function in patients with hip fracture in the acute hospital setting. Methods Three databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL) were searched. Studies reporting direct clinician assessment instruments to measure mobility or physical function in patients with hip fracture were included. Data were extracted by 2 reviewers, and the quality of each study was determined using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments risk of bias checklist. Results Sixty-eight studies were included with 19 measurement instruments identified. The most frequently used instruments were the Timed "Up & Go" Test (TUG) (19 studies), Barthel Index (BI) (18 studies), Cumulated Ambulation Score (CAS) (18 studies), and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) (14 studies). All 4 of these instruments demonstrated good predictive validity (clinical outcomes and mortality) and responsiveness over time (effect sizes 0.63–2.79). The BI and CAS also had good reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] >0.70). Floor effects were demonstrated for the TUG, CAS, and FIM (16%–60% of patients). The TUG, CAS, and BI all had good clinical utility. Conclusion Depending on the context (use by treating clinicians, research, benchmarking), 1 or a combination of the BI, CAS, and TUG provide robust measurement of mobility and physical function for patients with hip fracture in the acute hospital setting. Impact This study identified 3 instruments suitable for measuring mobility and physical function in hospitalized patients following hip fracture. This provides clinicians with tools to measure patient progress and benchmark across sites to improve patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of PTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
