دورية أكاديمية

TACE versus TARE for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Overall and individual patient level meta analysis.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: TACE versus TARE for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Overall and individual patient level meta analysis.
المؤلفون: Brown, Andrew M., Kassab, Ihab, Massani, Marco, Townsend, Whitney, Singal, Amit G., Soydal, Cigdem, Moreno‐Luna, Laura, Roberts, Lewis R., Chen, Vincent L., Parikh, Neehar D.
المصدر: Cancer Medicine; Feb2023, Vol. 12 Issue 3, p2590-2599, 10p
مصطلحات موضوعية: HEPATOCELLULAR carcinoma, CHEMOEMBOLIZATION, LIVER cancer, TUMOR classification, OVERALL survival
مستخلص: Background: Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is increasingly used as an alternative to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to perform an overall and individual patient data (IPD) meta‐analysis of studies comparing TACE and TARE. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search using pre‐specified keywords with the aid of an informationist for articles from inception to 3/2020. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was time to progression (TTP). Results: Seventeen studies met inclusion criteria with 2465 unique patients, with one randomized trial, 4 prospective studies and 12 retrospective studies. Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B (42.8%) was the most common stage followed by BCLC A (30.3%) and BCLC C (29.0%). There was no difference in OS between the two modalities (−0.55 months, 95% CI −1.95 to 3.05). In three studies with available TTP data, TARE resulted in a longer TTP than TACE (mean TTP 17.5 vs. 9.8 months; mean TTP difference 4.8 months, 95% CI 1.3–8.3 months). IPD‐level meta‐analysis of 311 patients from three studies showed no difference in overall OS between the two modalities including among subgroups stratified by tumor stage and liver function. Limitations of the current literature include inconsistent length of follow‐up, inconsistency in response criteria, and safety reporting. Conclusions: Current data suggest TARE provides significantly longer TTP than TACE, although the two treatments do not significantly differ in terms of OS. Given limitations of the current data, there is rationale for prospective studies comparing these modalities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Cancer Medicine is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:20457634
DOI:10.1002/cam4.5125