التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: |
Nutrition support and intervention preferences of cancer survivors. |
المؤلفون: |
Keaver, Laura, O'Callaghan, Niamh, Douglas, Pauline |
المصدر: |
Journal of Human Nutrition & Dietetics; Apr2023, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p526-539, 14p |
مصطلحات موضوعية: |
CANCER patient psychology, FOCUS groups, SOCIAL support, RESEARCH methodology, CROSS-sectional method, DIET therapy, SURVEYS, HEALTH attitudes, INFORMATION needs, NEEDS assessment, THEMATIC analysis |
مصطلحات جغرافية: |
IRELAND |
مستخلص: |
Introduction: Ascertaining cancer survivors' specific needs and preferences regarding nutrition information delivery is important in developing and designing future health interventions in oncology. The present study aimed to explore the nutrition information needs of cancer survivors and their preferences regarding intervention delivery. Methods: The present study is a mixed‐methods study comprising a cross‐sectional survey and focus groups. Participants were eligible for inclusion if they were aged ≥ 18 years, living in Ireland with a cancer diagnosis and had completed treatment at least 6 months previously. Cancer support centres promoted the online survey on social media. Focus groups were conducted with 20 individuals. Results: The cohort (n = 56) was predominantly female (n = 50; 89.3%) breast cancer survivors (n = 42; 75%). Seven (12.5%) had received nutrition advice from a dietitian. Most were interested in receiving nutrition advice (n = 52; 92.9%), with variability in delivery mode. There was interest in improving sleep quality (n = 35; 62.5%), making positive lifestyle changes (n = 28; 50%) and accessing cancer‐specific physical activity classes (n = 27; 48.2%). The best time to deliver information was throughout the cancer journey (n = 31; 55.4%). Time and motivation (n = 15; 26.8%) were the main barriers. Facilitators were keeping healthy (n = 42; 75%) and weight maintenance (n = 31; 55.4%). Four themes emerged from thematic analysis: lack of nutrition guidance, an abundance of misinformation, one size does not fit all and dietitians as the preferred source of advice. Conclusions: There is a desire for evidence‐based nutrition advice and for dietitians to be integrated into cancer clinics and cancer survivorship care. This research guides future nutrition interventions to improve cancer survivorship outcomes. Key points: The majority of the cohort were interested in receiving nutrition advice with variability in preference of delivery method. Information should be available throughout the cancer journey.There was also interest in education around improving sleep quality and making positive lifestyle changes.During treatment, coping with side effects, dealing with fatigue, eating a balanced diet, improving cardiovascular health, eating problems and maintaining and building muscle mass were ranked as important/very important.After completing cancer treatment, coping with side effects, dealing with fatigue, eating a balanced diet, improving cardiovascular health and weight management were considered to be important/very important.Themes arising from the qualitative component of this research were: (1) distinct lack of nutrition guidance; (2) an abundance of misinformation; (3) one size does not fit all; and (4) dietitian as the preferred source of advice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Journal of Human Nutrition & Dietetics is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |