التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Delaware Court Reaffirms the Requirements to Bring a Successful Caremark Claim. |
| المؤلفون: |
Hobson, Mark D. |
| المصدر: |
Business Law Today; Dec2022, p4-7, 4p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
BUSINESS enterprises, BOARDS of directors, JUDGES |
| مستخلص: |
The plaintiffs in the SolarWinds case were a group of shareholders of the Company, and the defendants were members of the Board at the time of the Sunburst Attack, as well as the Company itself, as a nominal defendant. On November 1, 2021, the plaintiffs filed a derivative action with the Delaware Court of Chancery, seeking to hold the defendants liable for damages for failing to monitor the Company and its operations in a manner that would have prevented the Sunburst Attack. A recent case before the Delaware Court of Chancery-Construction Industry Laborers Pension Fund v. Bingle (Del Ch. Sept. 6, 2022) (the "SolarWinds case")-reaffirmed the requirements plaintiffs need to satisfy in order to successfully prevail, and the difficulty of prevailing, under so-called Caremark claims. [Extracted from the article] |
|
Copyright of Business Law Today is the property of American Bar Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
