دورية أكاديمية

Real-life introduction of powered circular stapler for esophagogastric anastomosis: cohort and propensity matched score study.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Real-life introduction of powered circular stapler for esophagogastric anastomosis: cohort and propensity matched score study.
المؤلفون: Vanstraelen, Stijn, Coosemans, Willy, Depypere, Lieven, Mandeville, Yannick, Moons, Johnny, Veer, Hans Van, Nafteux, Philippe
المصدر: Diseases of the Esophagus; May2023, Vol. 36 Issue 5, p1-7, 7p
مصطلحات موضوعية: PROPENSITY score matching, STAPLERS (Surgery), SURGICAL complications, BODY mass index, ESOPHAGEAL cancer, NEOADJUVANT chemotherapy
مستخلص: Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy is one of the most feared complications, which results in increased morbidity and mortality. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of a powered circular stapler on complications after esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis for esophageal cancer. Between May 2019 and July 2021, all consecutive oesophagectomies for cancer with intrathoracic anastomosis in a high-volume center were included in this retrospective study. Surgeons were free to choose either a manual or a powered circular stapler. Preoperative characteristics and postoperative complications were recorded in a prospective database, according to EsoData. Propensity score matching (age, body mass index, Eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance and neoadjuvant therapy) was conducted to reduce potential confounding. We included 128 patients. Powered and manual circular staplers were used in 62 and 66 patients, respectively. Fewer anastomotic leakages were observed with the powered stapler group (OR = 7.3 (95%CI: 1.58–33.7); [3.2% (n  = 2) vs 19.7% (n  = 13), respectively; p  = 0.004]). After propensity score matching, this remained statistically significant (OR = 8.5 (95%CI: 1.80–40.1); [4.1% (n  = 2) vs 20.4% (n  = 10), respectively; p  = 0.013]). Additionally, anastomotic diameter was significantly higher with the powered stapler (median: 29 mm (63.3%) vs 25 mm (57.1%), respectively; p  < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in comprehensive complication index (p  = 0.146). A decreased mean length of stay was observed in the powered stapler group (11.1 vs 18.7 days respectively; p  = 0.022). Postoperative anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection was significantly reduced after the introduction of the powered circular stapler, consequently resulting in a reduced length of stay. Further evaluation on long-term strictures and quality of life are warranted to support these results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Diseases of the Esophagus is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:11208694
DOI:10.1093/dote/doac073