التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Is A One-Question Visual Analog Scale A Screening Tool That Can Be Used to Assess Female Sexual Dysfunction Before Implementing A Female Sexual Function Index? |
| المؤلفون: |
Koparal, Murat Yavuz, Bulut, Ender Cem, Çetin, Serhat, Onaran, Metin, Şen, İlker |
| المصدر: |
Journal of Urological Surgery; Jun2023, Vol. 10 Issue 2, p147-151, 5p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
EXPERIMENTAL design, STATISTICS, FEMALE reproductive organ diseases, SEXUAL dysfunction, CONFIDENCE intervals, RESEARCH methodology evaluation, HUMAN sexuality, RESEARCH methodology, MEDICAL screening, VISUAL analog scale, OVERACTIVE bladder, RISK assessment, URINARY incontinence, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, RECEIVER operating characteristic curves, DATA analysis, DISEASE risk factors |
| مستخلص: |
Objective: To validate the use of a single-question visual analog scale assessing sexual dysfunction as a screening tool before implementing the female sexual function index (FSFI). Materials and Methods: The study included 141 sexually active women over 18 years of age who were diagnosed with OAB or UI. A female sexual function-visual analog scale (FSF-VAS) was defined and developed as a one-question form in which participants were asked to mark their sexual function on a 10 cm visual analog scale. The cut-off values for the FSF-VAS in predicting FSD were determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and Youden's index. Results: A positive, moderately strong correlation was found between the FSFI score and FSF-VAS (rs=0.741). We found a cut-off value for FSF-VAS as 5.95 for in predicting both FSFI score of <25 [area under the curve (AUC) (confidence interval (CI) 95%): 0.886 (0.827-0.945)] and FSFI score of <26.55 [AUC (CI 95%): 0.893 (0.834-0.952)]. FSF-VAS value was below 5.95 in 82 of 141 (58.1%) patients who participated in the study. Conclusion: Using the FSFI for only those with a FSF-VAS score of 5.95 or lower will reduce the clinician's Workload save time, and also spare patients from the embarrassment caused by the questions in the FSFI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Journal of Urological Surgery is the property of Galenos Yayinevi Tic. LTD. STI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
Full Text Finder