دورية أكاديمية

The Effect of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (BMP-2) on Volumetric and Histometric Outcomes for Peri-Implant Defects in the Animal Model: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: The Effect of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (BMP-2) on Volumetric and Histometric Outcomes for Peri-Implant Defects in the Animal Model: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
المؤلفون: Lee, Eric, Moy, Alyssa, Trung Nguyen, Kao, Richard, Guo-Hao Lin
المصدر: International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants; Jul/Aug2023, Vol. 38 Issue 4, p651-666e, 21p
مصطلحات موضوعية: PERIODONTITIS treatment, BIOLOGICAL models, DENTAL implants, ONLINE information services, META-analysis, CONFIDENCE intervals, MEDICAL information storage & retrieval systems, BONE resorption, PERIODONTITIS, ANIMAL experimentation, SYSTEMATIC reviews, BONE morphogenetic proteins, ALVEOLAR process, TREATMENT effectiveness, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, MEDLINE
مستخلص: Purpose: To study the effect of BMP-2 on the volumetric and histometric changes in peri-implant defect treatments in animal models. Materials and Methods: An electronic search of four databases and a manual search of peer-reviewed journals for relevant articles were performed. Animal studies with data that compared the volumetric and/or histometric outcomes of peri-implant defect treatment with and without the use of BMP-2 were included. Meta-analyses were performed to analyze the weighted mean difference (WMD) and confidence interval (CI) for the recorded variables. Results: After completing the search process, 21 randomized controlled trials were included. The results of the metaanalyses showed that the WMD of bone-to-implant contact (%BIC) with 4 to 8 weeks and 12 to 24 weeks of follow-up was 15.50% (95% CI = 3.28% to 27.72%, P = .01) and 16.17% (95% CI = 11.17% to 21.16%, P < .00001), respectively, favoring the BMP-2 group. The WMD for the percentage of defect fill with 4 to 8 weeks and 12 to 24 weeks of follow-up was 15.88% (95% CI = 3.90% to 27.86%, P = .009) and 10.48% (95% CI = 0.95% to 20.02%, P = .03), respectively, favoring the BMP-2 group. The WMD for the vertical bone gain with 8 to 16 weeks of follow-up was 1.63 mm (95% CI = 0.58 to 2.67 mm, P = .002), also favoring the BMP-2 group. Conclusion: This review demonstrated that the use of BMP-2 in treating periimplant defects showed better clinical and histometric outcomes than defects not treated with BMP-2 in animal models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants is the property of Quintessence Publishing Company Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:08822786
DOI:10.11607/jomi.10027