التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
「他們看見了抗議」（下）. (Chinese) |
| Alternate Title: |
“They Saw a Protest”: Cognitive Illiberalism and the SpeechConduct Distinction. (English) |
| المؤلفون: |
Kahan, Dan M., Hoffman, David A., Braman, Donald, Evans, Danieli, Rachlinski, Jeffrey J. |
| المصدر: |
Taiwan Law Review; Sep2023, Issue 340, p177-192, 16p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
PUBLIC demonstrations, RECRUITING & enlistment (Armed Forces), ABORTION clinics, MILITARY policy, CONSTITUTIONAL law |
| Abstract (English): |
“Cultural cognition” refers to the unconscious influence of individuals’ group commitments on their perceptions of legally consequential facts. We conducted an experiment to assess the impact of cultural cognition on perceptions of facts relevant to distinguishing constitutionally protected “speech” from unprotected “conduct.” Study subjects viewed a video of a political demonstration. Half the subjects believed that the demonstrators were protesting abortion outside of an abortion clinic, and the other half that the demonstrators were protesting the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy outside a military recruitment center. Subjects of opposing cultural outlooks who were assigned to the same experimental condition (and thus had the same belief about the nature of the protest) disagreed sharply on key “facts”— including whether the protestors obstructed and threatened pedestrians. Subjects also disagreed sharply with those who shared their cultural outlooks but who were assigned to the opposing experimental condition (and hence had a different belief about the nature of the protest). These results supported the study hypotheses about how cultural cognition would affect perceptions pertinent to the speech-conduct distinction. We discuss the significance of the results for constitutional law and liberal principles of self-governance generally. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Abstract (Chinese): |
文化性認知是個人之團體認同對其認知法律上重要事實的潛意識影響。本文以實驗方 法評估文化認知對事實認知的影響，此事實關乎區辨「言論」（受憲法保護）與「行為」 （不受憲法保護）。受試者觀看政治示威的影片：半數相信示威者在墮胎診所外抗議墮 胎；另一半在軍方招募中心外抗議軍方「不問也不說」的政策。相反文化觀的受試者，若 分配到相同的實驗條件（因此對抗議本質的認知相同），對關鍵的「事實」有很不同的看 法—包括抗議者是否妨礙或威脅路人。當受試者有同樣文化觀，但被分配到不同的實驗條 件（因此對抗議本質的認知不同），對關鍵的「事實」也有很不同的看法。此實證發現支 持了研究假設，即文化性認知影響了對言論與行為分野的觀感。本文最後討論研究結果對 憲法學與自治的自由主義原則的重要性。 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Taiwan Law Review is the property of Angle Publishing Co., Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
