التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Impact of Remote Symptom Monitoring With Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on Hospitalization, Survival, and Cost in Community Oncology Practice: The Texas Two-Step Study. |
| المؤلفون: |
Patt, Debra A., Patel, Amila Meera, Bhardwaj, Arun, Hudson, Kathryn Elizabeth, Christman, Amanda, Amondikar, Ninad, Escudier, Susan Marie, Townsend, Sydney, Books, Holly, Basch, Ethan |
| المصدر: |
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics; 10/28/2023, Vol. 7, p1-8, 8p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
PATIENT reported outcome measures, MEDICAL care costs, HOSPITAL care, CANCER patients, PROPENSITY score matching, CHILD patients |
| مصطلحات جغرافية: |
TEXAS |
| مستخلص: |
PURPOSE: There is raising interest to implement electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) for symptom monitoring to enhance the quality of cancer care. Step 1 of the Texas Two-Step Study demonstrated successful implementation of an ePRO system in >200 sites of service of a large community oncology practice. We now report step 2 of this study which evaluates the impact of ePROs on outcomes among patients enrolled in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Oncology Care Model (OCM) program. METHODS: This observational study focused on patients with metastatic cancer enrolled in OCM at large community oncology practice located in Texas between July 2020 and December 2020. Patients who completed ≥1 survey via the ePRO tool were included in the study group and were propensity score matched with patients in a control group. Adverse events (AEs; hospitalizations, emergency department visits, deaths) and total cost of care were a priori study outcomes. Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests compared continuous and categorical variables, respectively, with multivariable logistic regression for adjustment of covariates. RESULTS: Of 831 patients with metastatic cancer, 458 matched patients (229/group) were identified, with 52% male and a mean age of 74 years. Mean total AEs were lower in the study group compared with control (0.98 v 1.41; P =.007), with decreased hospitalizations (20% v 32.5%; P =.002), emergency visits (38.4% v 42.3%; P >.05), and deaths (11.8% v 16.6%; P >.05). Average number of hospitalizations was lower (0.28 v 0.52; P =.003) with reduced mean duration of hospitalizations (1.9 vs 3.2 d; P =.03). The total cost of care was reduced by an average of $1,146 per member per month. CONCLUSION: Symptom monitoring with ePROs improved quality and value of cancer care delivery by reducing hospitalizations, emergency visits, and deaths while lowering cost of care in a large oncology practice. The Texas Two-Step Study demonstrates #ePROs improve outcomes and reduce costs for patients with advanced cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics is the property of American Society of Clinical Oncology and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
