دورية أكاديمية

RETENTION AND MARGINAL INTEGRITY OF CAD/CAM FABRICATED CROWNS ADHESIVELY CEMENTED TO TITANIUM BASE ABUTMENTS--INFLUENCE OF BONDING SYSTEM AND RESTORATIVE MATERIAL.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: RETENTION AND MARGINAL INTEGRITY OF CAD/CAM FABRICATED CROWNS ADHESIVELY CEMENTED TO TITANIUM BASE ABUTMENTS--INFLUENCE OF BONDING SYSTEM AND RESTORATIVE MATERIAL.
المؤلفون: Burkhardt, Felix, Sailer, Irena, Fehmer, Vincent, Mojon, Philippe, Pitta, João
المصدر: International Journal of Prosthodontics; Sep/Oct2023, Vol. 36 Issue 5, pe58-e102, 15p, 4 Color Photographs, 1 Diagram, 3 Charts, 1 Graph
مصطلحات موضوعية: DENTAL crowns, PHOTOVOLTAIC power systems, TWO-way analysis of variance, TITANIUM, MICROSCOPES
مستخلص: Purpose: To assess the influence of the bonding system and restora5ve material on the marginal integrity and pull-off forces of monolithic all-ceramic crowns bonded to 5tanium base (5-base) abutments. Materials and Methods: A total of 108 5-bases were sandblasted and divided into nine experimental groups (n = 12) according to the combina5on of crown material (polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network [PI], lithium-disilicate [LD], and zirconia [ZI]) and bonding system (Mul5link Hybrid-Abutment [MH], Panavia V5 [PV], RelyX Ul5mate [RU]) with the respec5ve primers. AXer bonding the crowns to the 5-base abutments, the restora5ons were screw-retained on implants and thermomechanically aged (1,200,000 cycles, 49 N, 1.67 Hz, 5 to 55°C). Marginal integrity and bonding failures were evaluated under a light microscope, and pull-off forces (N) were calculated. Chi-square tests for marginal integrity as well as one-way and two-way ANOVA sta5s5cal tests for pull-off forces were applied (α = .05). Results: PI presented higher marginal integrity than LD (P = .023). Bonding system PV revealed higher marginal integrity than MH (P =.005) and RU (P =.029). Differences in pull-off forces were found between restora5ve material and resin cements (P < .001), with the highest values for ZI + RU (598 ± 192 N), PI + PV (545 ± 114 N), LD + MH (532 ± 116 N), and PI + RU (528 ± 81 N). Specimens with marginal integrity revealed higher pull-off forces than those with altera5on (P = .006). Specimens presen5ng bonding failures (micromovements) showed lower pull-off forces than those without bonding failures (P < .001). Conclusions: The tested CAD/CAM materials show favorable bonding performances with different bonding systems, nevertheless for each restora5ve material a specific bonding system has to be recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of International Journal of Prosthodontics is the property of Quintessence Publishing Company Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:08932174
DOI:10.11607/ijp.7576