دورية أكاديمية

Comparison of analog and digitally evaluated volume of the female breast in reconstructive breast surgery. Validation of a noninvasive measurement method with 3D camera1.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Comparison of analog and digitally evaluated volume of the female breast in reconstructive breast surgery. Validation of a noninvasive measurement method with 3D camera1.
المؤلفون: Brebant, V., Lemonnier, L., Georgieva, M., Anker, A., Heine, N., Seitz, S., Frank, K., Prantl, L., Eigenberger, A.
المصدر: Clinical Hemorheology & Microcirculation; 2023, Vol. 85 Issue 3, p277-287, 11p
مصطلحات موضوعية: PLASTIC surgery, BREAST surgery, MAMMAPLASTY, THREE-dimensional imaging, MASTECTOMY, VOLUME (Cubic content)
مستخلص: BACKGROUND: Reconstructive surgery is established as a standard treatment option after mastectomy due to cancer. It is crucial to patients to achieve a natural and symmetric looking breast through reconstruction. Anthropometric measurements are used to assess the objective symmetry of the breast, which are prone to errors and difficult to reproduce. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work is to validate breast volumetry using three-dimensional surface imaging. METHODS: We compared preoperatively analog and digitally evaluated volume of the breast with our gold standard, direct water displacement measurement of the mastectomy specimen. We examined 34 breast specimens in total. RESULTS: Each measurement method (Breast Sculptor, VAM, Breast-V) for breast volume/mass determination demonstrates acceptable agreement ranges when compared with resected volumes and masses. The strongest volumetry instrument is Breast Sculptor (digital), the weakest is Breast-V (analog). CONCLUSIONS: 3D surface imaging is a quick, effective, and convenient method to evaluate breast shape and volume. The accuracy, reproducibility, and reliability of 3D surface imaging were comparable with MRI in our study. This takes us a step closer to the long-term goal of establishing robust instruments to plan breast reconstructive surgery, achieve better surgical results, and contribute to quality assurance in breast surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Clinical Hemorheology & Microcirculation is the property of IOS Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:13860291
DOI:10.3233/CH-229101