التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy in hippocampal avoidance whole‐brain radiotherapy. |
| المؤلفون: |
Zhang, Huai‐wen, Hu, Bo, Pang, Hao‐wen |
| المصدر: |
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics; Jan2024, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p1-7, 7p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
VOLUMETRIC-modulated arc therapy, MEDICAL dosimetry, RADIATION doses, CRYSTALLINE lens, RADIOTHERAPY |
| مستخلص: |
Objective: This study aimed to discuss the dosimetric advantages of helical tomotherapy (HT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technology in hippocampal avoidance whole‐brain radiotherapy and provide references for clinical selection of ideal radiotherapy technology. Methods: A total of 20 patients with hippocampal avoidance whole‐brain radiotherapy were chosen randomly. Computed tomography (CT) and MRI scanning images were input into the treatment planning system (TPS). After the CT and enhanced magnetic resonance T1 weighted images were fused and registered, the same radiation therapy physician was invited to outline the tumor target volume. PTV‐HS refers to the whole brain subtracted by 5 mm outward expansion of the hippocampus (HP). The prescribed dose was 30 Gy/10 fractions. HT and VMAT plans were designed for each patient in accordance with PTV. Under the premise that the 95% isodose curve covers the PTV, dose–volume histogram was applied to evaluate the PTV, conformal index (CI), heterogeneity index (HI), maximum dose (Dmax), mean dose (Dmean), minimum dose (Dmin) and absorbed doses of organs at risk (OARs) in HT and VMAT plans. Paired t‐test was performed to compare the differences between two radiation therapy plans, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: These two plans had no significant difference in PTV‐HS (max, min, and mean). However, the HI and CI of the HT plan were significantly better than those of the VMAT plan, showing statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). The HT plan was significantly superior to the VMAT plan in terms of the Dmax, Dmin, and Dmean of HP, left and right eye lens, left and right eye, and spinal cord, showing statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). The HT plan was also better than the VMAT plan in terms of the Dmax of the left optic nerve. However, the two plans showed no obvious differences in terms of the absorbed doses of the right optic nerve and brainstem, without statistical significance. Conclusions: Compared with the VMAT plan of hippocampal avoidance, HT technology has significant dosimetric advantages. HT plans significantly decreased the radiation dose and radiation volume of OARs surrounding the target area (e.g., surrounding eye lens and eye, especially hippocampal avoidance area) while increasing the CI and HI of PTV dose in whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) greatly, thus enabling the decrease in the incidence rate of radioactive nerve function impairment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
Full Text Finder