التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
The ecological, economic and social impact of the integrated farming system of Mina Padi in Subak Empelan Demulih Bangli. |
| المؤلفون: |
Sudirta, I. Wayan, Surata, Sang Putu Kaler, Sujana, I. Putu |
| المصدر: |
AIP Conference Proceedings; 2024, Vol. 2961 Issue 1, p1-7, 7p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
INTEGRATED agricultural systems, SOCIAL impact, RICE, ECONOMIC impact, AGRICULTURE, RICE farming, MONOCULTURE agriculture |
| مستخلص: |
There have been many published studies on the mina-rice biculture farming system, but not much literature has been found on the perspective of farmers, especially in groups on the system. This study aims to analyze the ecological, economic and social impacts of Mina Padi intercropping; and describe farmers' opinions about the ecological, economic and social impacts of intercropping Mina Padi. The study used a mixed-method explanatory sequential method, which is a combination research method starting with quantitative methods and then followed by qualitative methods. Experimental method with randomized block design (RAK) was used to obtain data on ecological and economic impacts. A total of four treatments were applied in the RAK, namely (A) mina padi with a 100% fertilization dose (1 kg urea + 1.5 kg Phonska NPK fertilizer per acre); (B) mina padi with 75% fertilization (0.75 kg urea + 1.125 kg Phonska NPK per acre); (C) mina padi with 50% fertilization dose (0.50 kg urea + 0.75 NPK Phonska per acre); (D) rice monoculture with 100% fertilization dose (1 kg urea + 1.5 kg Phonska NPK per are) as control. Data on social impacts were obtained through qualitative analysis of the results of interviews and focus group discussions with farmers. The results showed that treatment A produced the highest rice production compared to other treatments. While treatment C resulted in normal soil pH and low electrical conductivity. Even though economically all treatments provided benefits within a certain period of time (R/C ratio > 1), only treatment D produced B/C ratio < 1, which means it is not worth continuing. This means that, both from an ecological and economic perspective, mina-padi farming is better than monoculture rice farming. The positive response of farmers to the existence of mina-padi agriculture in improving harmonious relations, increasing the frequency of meetings and discussions in the fields, as well as opening up economic opportunities shows that the bicultural farming system has a positive social impact. Thus, Mina Padi farming is feasible to continue to be developed because it is ecologically more friendly to the environment, economically more profitable and socially acceptable to farmers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of AIP Conference Proceedings is the property of American Institute of Physics and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
Find this article in full text from Scitation.