دورية أكاديمية

Left bundle branch pacing better preserves ventricular mechanical synchrony than right ventricular pacing: a two-centre study.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Left bundle branch pacing better preserves ventricular mechanical synchrony than right ventricular pacing: a two-centre study.
المؤلفون: Mao, Yankai, Duchenne, Jürgen, Yang, Yuan, Garweg, Christophe, Yang, Ying, Sheng, Xia, Zhang, Jiefang, Ye, Yang, Wang, Min, Paton, Maria F, Puvrez, Alexis, Vöros, Gabor, Ma, Mingming, Fu, Guosheng, Voigt, Jens-Uwe
المصدر: European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging; Mar2024, Vol. 25 Issue 3, p328-336, 9p
مصطلحات موضوعية: ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, RESEARCH, BUNDLE-branch block, LEFT ventricular dysfunction, VENTRICULAR remodeling, CARDIAC pacing, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, RESEARCH funding
مستخلص: Aims Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has been shown to better maintain electrical synchrony compared with right ventricular pacing (RVP), but little is known about its impact on mechanical synchrony. This study investigates whether LBBP better preserves left ventricular (LV) mechanical synchronicity and function compared with RVP. Methods and results Sixty patients with pacing indication for bradycardia were included: LBBP (n = 31) and RVP (n = 29). Echocardiography was performed before and shortly after pacemaker implantation and at 1-year follow-up. The lateral wall–septal wall (LW–SW) work difference was used as a measure of mechanical dyssynchrony. Septal flash, apical rocking, and septal strain patterns were also assessed. At baseline, LW–SW work difference was small and similar in two groups. SW was markedly decreased, while LW work remained mostly unchanged in RVP, resulting in a larger LW–SW work difference compared with LBBP (1253 ± 687 mmHg·% vs. 439 ± 408 mmHg·%, P < 0.01) at last follow-up. In addition, RVP more often induced septal flash or apical rocking and resulted in more advanced strain patterns compared with LBBP. At 1 year follow-up, LV ejection fraction (EF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) were more decreased in RVP compared with LBBP (ΔLVEF: −7.4 ± 7.0% vs. 0.3 ± 4.1%; ΔLVGLS: −4.8 ± 4.0% vs. −1.4 ± 2.5%, both P < 0.01). In addition, ΔLW–SW work difference was independently correlated with LV adverse remodelling (r = 0.42, P < 0.01) and LV dysfunction (ΔLVEF: r = −0.61, P < 0.01 and ΔLVGLS: r = −0.38, P = 0.02). Conclusion LBBP causes less LV mechanical dyssynchrony than RVP as it preserves a more physiologic electrical conduction. As a consequence, LBBP appears to preserve LV function better than RVP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:20472404
DOI:10.1093/ehjci/jead296