دورية أكاديمية

Artificial intelligence-based fluid quantification and associated visual outcomes in a real-world, multicentre neovascular age-related macular degeneration national database.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Artificial intelligence-based fluid quantification and associated visual outcomes in a real-world, multicentre neovascular age-related macular degeneration national database.
المؤلفون: Martin-Pinardel, Ruben, Izquierdo-Serra, Jordi, De Zanet, Sandro, Parrado-Carrillo, Alba, Garay-Aramburu, Gonzaga, Puzo, Martin, Arruabarrena, Carolina, Sararols, Laura, Abraldes, Maximino, Broc, Laura, Escobar-Barranco, Jose Juan, Figueroa, Marta, Zapata, Miguel Angel, Ruiz-Moreno, José M., Moll-Udina, Aina, Bernal-Morales, Carolina, Alforja, Socorro, Figueras-Roca, Marc, Gómez-Baldó, Laia, Ciller, Carlos
المصدر: British Journal of Ophthalmology; Feb2024, Vol. 108 Issue 2, p253-262, 10p
مستخلص: Aim To explore associations between artificial intelligence (AI)-based fluid compartment quantifications and 12 months visual outcomes in OCT images from a real-world, multicentre, national cohort of naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated eyes. Methods Demographics, visual acuity (VA), drug and number of injections data were collected using a validated web-based tool. Fluid compartment quantifications including intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF) and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) in the fovea (1 mm), parafovea (3 mm) and perifovea (6 mm) were measured in nanoliters (nL) using a validated AI-tool. Results 452 naïve nAMD eyes presented a mean VA gain of +5.5 letters with a median of 7 injections over 12 months. Baseline foveal IRF associated poorer baseline (44.7 vs 63.4 letters) and final VA (52.1 vs 69.1), SRF better final VA (67.1 vs 59.0) and greater VA gains (+7.1 vs +1.9), and PED poorer baseline (48.8 vs 57.3) and final VA (55.1 vs 64.1). Predicted VA gains were greater for foveal SRF (+6.2 vs +0.6), parafoveal SRF (+6.9 vs +1.3), perifoveal SRF (+6.2 vs -0.1) and parafoveal IRF (+7.4 vs +3.6, all p<0.05). Fluid dynamics analysis revealed the greatest relative volume reduction for foveal SRF (-16.4 nL, -86.8%), followed by IRF (-17.2 nL, -84.7%) and PED (-19.1 nL, -28.6%). Subgroup analysis showed greater reductions in eyes with higher number of injections. Conclusion This real-world study describes an AI-based analysis of fluid dynamics and defines baseline OCT-based patient profiles that associate 12-month visual outcomes in a large cohort of treated naïve nAMD eyes nationwide. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of British Journal of Ophthalmology is the property of BMJ Publishing Group and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:00071161
DOI:10.1136/bjo-2022-322297