التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: |
Quality assurance for building-stock energy models: a performance comparison of eleven uncertainty and sensitivity analysis methods. |
المؤلفون: |
Van Hove, M. Y. C., Delghust, M., Laverge, J. |
المصدر: |
Journal of Building Performance Simulation; Mar2024, Vol. 17 Issue 2, p149-175, 27p |
مصطلحات موضوعية: |
SENSITIVITY analysis, QUALITY assurance, PERFORMANCE theory |
مستخلص: |
Building-Stock Energy Models (BSEMs) have grown in popularity, implementation, scale and complexity. Yet, BSEM quality assurance processes have lagged behind. This article proposes a scalable methodology to apply Uncertainty (UA) and Sensitivity Analysis (SA) to BSEMs and studies the performance of eleven common UA-SA methods (OAT, SRC, SRRC, FFD, Morris, Sobol', eFAST, FAST-RBD, DMIM, PAWN, DGSM) for three UA-SA targets: screening, ranking and indices. Applying UA and SA to BSEMs requires a two-step input parameter sampling that samples 'across stocks' and 'within stocks'. To make efficient use of computational resources, practitioners should (i) distinguish between three UA-SA targets and (ii) choose a method based on the aimed UA-SA target. The computational cost varies according to the UA-SA target and method; (i) for screening: OAT, SRC, SRRC, FFD and Morris; (ii) for ranking: SRC, SRRC and Morris and (iii) for indices: Sobol' is the most efficient, among the tested UA-SA methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Journal of Building Performance Simulation is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |