التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
MR Elastography of the Pancreas: Bowel Preparation and Repeatability Assessment in Pancreatic Cancer Patients and Healthy Controls. |
| المؤلفون: |
Wassenaar, Nienke P.M., van Schelt, Anne‐Sophie, Schrauben, Eric M., Kop, Marnix P.M., Nio, C. Yung, Wilmink, Johanna W., Besselink, Marc G.H., van Laarhoven, Hanneke W.M., Stoker, Jaap, Nederveen, Aart J., Runge, Jurgen H. |
| المصدر: |
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging; May2024, Vol. 59 Issue 5, p1582-1592, 11p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
PANCREATIC cancer, PANCREAS, CANCER patients, STATISTICAL reliability, PANCREATIC duct |
| مستخلص: |
Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) stromal viscoelasticity can be measured using MR elastography (MRE). Bowel preparation regimens could affect MRE quality and knowledge on repeatability is crucial for clinical implementation. Purpose: To assess effects of four bowel preparation regimens on MRE quality and to evaluate repeatability and differentiate patients from healthy controls. Study Type: Prospective. Population: 15 controls (41 ± 16 years; 47% female), 16 PDAC patients (one excluded, 66 ± 12 years; 40% female) with 15 age‐/sex‐matched controls (65 ± 11 years; 40% female). Final sample size was 25 controls and 15 PDAC. Field Strength/Sequence: 3‐T, spin‐echo echo‐planar‐imaging, turbo spin‐echo, and fast field echo gradient‐echo. Assessment: Four different regimens were used: fasting; scopolaminebutyl; drinking 0.5 L water; combination of 0.5 L water and scopolaminebutyl. MRE signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) was compared between all regimens. MRE repeatability (test–retest) and differences in shear wave speed (SWS) and phase angle (ϕ) were assessed in PDAC and controls. Regions‐of‐interest were defined for tumor, nontumorous (n = 8) tissue in PDAC, and whole pancreas in controls. Two radiologists delineated tumors twice for evaluation of intraobserver and interobserver variability. Statistical Tests: Repeated measures analysis of variance, coefficients of variation (CoVs), Bland–Altman analysis, (un)paired t‐test, Mann–Whitney U‐test, and Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. P‐value<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Preparation regimens did not significantly influence MRE‐SNR. Therefore, the least burdensome preparation (fasting only) was continued. CoVs for tumor SWS were: intrasession (12.8%) and intersession (21.7%), and intraobserver (7.9%) and interobserver (10.3%) comparisons. For controls, CoVs were intrasession (4.6%) and intersession (6.4%). Average SWS for tumor, nontumor, and healthy tissue were: 1.74 ± 0.58, 1.38 ± 0.27, and 1.18 ± 0.16 m/sec (ϕ: 1.02 ± 0.17, 0.91 ± 0.07, and 0.85 ± 0.08 rad), respectively. Significant differences were found between all groups, except for ϕ between healthy–nontumor (P = 0.094). Data Conclusion: The proposed bowel preparation regimens may not influence MRE quality. MRE may be able to differentiate between healthy tissue–tumor and tumor–nontumor. Level of Evidence: 2 Technical Efficacy Stage: 2 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
Full Text Finder