التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Anterior-Posterior Center of Pressure Is Associated With Knee Extensor Moment During Landing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. |
| المؤلفون: |
Masato Chijimatsu, Rui Henmi, Hiroko Yokoyama, Yuka Kimura, Yasuyuki Ishibashi, Eiichi Tsuda |
| المصدر: |
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation; May2024, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p259-266, 8p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
LEG physiology, BIOMECHANICS, CROSS-sectional method, ANTERIOR cruciate ligament injuries, ANTERIOR cruciate ligament surgery, NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, NEUROMUSCULAR system, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, KNEE joint, ATHLETIC ability, GROUND reaction forces (Biomechanics), JUMPING, CEREBRAL dominance, DATA analysis software, MOTION capture (Human mechanics) |
| مستخلص: |
Context: A reduced knee extensor moment (KEM) in the involved limb and asymmetry in the KEM during landing tasks are observed after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). There is limited information about the association of kinetic and kinematic parameters with the KEM during landing after ACLR. This study investigated the association of the anterior--posterior center of pressure (AP-COP) position, vertical ground reaction force (VGRF), and lower limb joint angles with the KEM during landing in female athletes following ACLR. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Twenty-two female athletes who underwent ACLR performed a drop vertical jump at 7.9 (1.7) months after surgery. We evaluated the KEM, AP-COP position, VGRF, and sagittal plane hip, knee, and ankle angles using a 3-dimensional motion analysis system with force plates. Results: The peak KEM in the involved limb was significantly smaller than that in the uninvolved limb during landing (1.43 [0.33] N·m/kg/m vs 1.84 [0.41] Nm/kg/m, P = .001). The VGRF in the involved limb was significantly smaller than that in the uninvolved limb (11.9 [2.3] N/kg vs 14.6 [3.5] N/kg, P = .005). The limb symmetry index of the KEM was predicted by that of the VGRF (P < .001, R² = .621, β = 0.800). The KEM was predicted by the AP-COP position in the involved limb (P = .015, R² = .227, β = 0.513) and by the VGRF in the uninvolved limb (P = .018, R² = .213, β = 0.500). No significant correlation was noted between the KEM and the lower limb joint angles. Conclusions: The AP-COP position and VGRF were associated with the KEM during landing. Evaluating the VGRF and AP-COP position, not the lower limb joint angles, may contribute to understanding the KEM during double-leg landing after ACLR in the clinical setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Journal of Sport Rehabilitation is the property of Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
