التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
A Mobile Health Application Integrated in the Electronic Health Record for Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient–Reported Outcomes: A Controlled Interrupted Time‐Series Analysis of Impact on Visit Efficiency. |
| المؤلفون: |
Solomon, Daniel H., Altwies, Hallie, Santacroce, Leah, Ellrodt, Jack, Pham, Tammy, Stratton, Jacklyn, Landman, Adam, Dalal, Anuj, Collins, Jamie, Rudin, Robert S. |
| المصدر: |
Arthritis & Rheumatology; May2024, Vol. 76 Issue 5, p677-683, 7p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
RHEUMATOID arthritis treatment, MOBILE apps, QUESTIONNAIRES, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, TIME series analysis, TELEMEDICINE, LONGITUDINAL method, ELECTRONIC health records, HEALTH outcome assessment, CONFIDENCE intervals, EVALUATION |
| مستخلص: |
Objective: Patient‐reported outcome (PRO) collection between visits for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) could improve visit efficiency, reducing in‐person visits for patients with stable symptoms while facilitating access for those with symptoms. We examined whether a mobile health PRO application integrated in the electronic health record (EHR) could reduce visit volume for those with RA. Methods: We developed an application for RA that prompted patients every other day to complete brief PRO questionnaires. Results of the application were integrated into the EHR. We tested the application in a controlled interrupted time‐series analysis between 2020 and 2023. Rheumatologists received EHR‐based messages based on PRO results recommending the patient receive a visit earlier or later than scheduled. The primary outcome was monthly visit volume during the year before versus the year after initiation. Results: A total of 150 patients with RA consented and used the application. The median age was 62 years, 83% were female, 7% had fewer than 2 years of disease, and 50% were seropositive; 150 controls were well matched. Among those in the application cohort, the estimated monthly median visit volume in the year before use of the application was 31.2 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 28.0–34.3); in controls, this was 30.4 (95% CI 27.3–33.6). In the year using the application, the estimated monthly visit volume was 36.8 (95% CI 33.4–40.3) compared to 38.7 (95% CI 35.2–42.3) in controls. The difference in the differences between the cohorts was not statistically significant (−2.7 visits, 95% CI −9.3 to 4.0). No differences were noted in flare rates or visit delays. Conclusion: In this initial trial of a PRO application intervention to improve visit efficiency, we found no association with reduced visit volume. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Arthritis & Rheumatology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
Full Text Finder