دورية أكاديمية

The Place of Judgment in the Conversation: A Reply to Michael W. Clune.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: The Place of Judgment in the Conversation: A Reply to Michael W. Clune.
المؤلفون: Moran, Richard
المصدر: Modern Fiction Studies; Summer2024, Vol. 70 Issue 2, p294-305, 12p
مصطلحات موضوعية: EQUALITY, PHILOSOPHY, AESTHETIC judgment
Reviews & Products: DEFENSE of Judgment, A (Book)
People: CLUNE, Michael W.
مستخلص: I find much to admire in Michael W. Clune's book A Defense of Judgment. I have some points of disagreement as well. I think the argument concedes too much to the bad idea that political egalitarianism implies a lack of difference among judgments of value. I have reservations about the idea of "expertise" (let alone deference to experts) in philosophy or literary studies. And I believe that Clune's use of an essay of mine does not accurately portray its content or purpose. Nonetheless I think the book is a powerful and insightful intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Modern Fiction Studies is the property of Johns Hopkins University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:00267724
DOI:10.1353/mfs.2024.a928345