دورية أكاديمية

Using Bayesian hierarchical models for controlled post hoc subgroup analysis of clinical trials: application to smoking cessation treatment in American Indians and Alaska Natives.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Using Bayesian hierarchical models for controlled post hoc subgroup analysis of clinical trials: application to smoking cessation treatment in American Indians and Alaska Natives.
المؤلفون: Shergina, Elena, Richter, Kimber P., Makosky Daley, Christine, Faseru, Babalola, Choi, Won S., Gajewski, Byron J.
المصدر: Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics; 2024, Vol. 34 Issue 4, p513-525, 13p
مصطلحات موضوعية: ALASKA Natives, SMOKING cessation, CLINICAL trials, TREATMENT effect heterogeneity, SUBGROUP analysis (Experimental design), CLINICAL medicine
مصطلحات جغرافية: ALASKA
مستخلص: Clinical trials powered to detect subgroup effects provide the most reliable data on heterogeneity of treatment effect among different subpopulations. However, pre-specified subgroup analysis is not always practical and post hoc analysis results should be examined cautiously. Bayesian hierarchical modelling provides grounds for defining a controlled post hoc analysis plan that is developed after seeing outcome data for the population but before unblinding the outcome by subgroup. Using simulation based on the results from a tobacco cessation clinical trial conducted among the general population, we defined an analysis plan to assess treatment effect among American Indians and Alaska Natives (AI/AN) enrolled in the study. Patients were randomized into two arms using Bayesian adaptive design. For the opt-in arm, clinicians offered a cessation treatment plan after verifying that a patient was ready to quit. For the opt-out arm, clinicians provided all participants with free cessation medications and referred them to a Quitline. The study was powered to test a hypothesis of significantly higher quit rates for the opt-out arm at one-month post randomization. Overall, one-month abstinence rates were 15.9% and 21.5% (opt-in and opt-out arm, respectively). For AI/AN, one-month abstinence rates were 10.2% and 22.0% (opt-in and opt-out arm, respectively). The posterior probability that the abstinence rate in the treatment arm is higher is 0.96, indicating that AI/AN demonstrate response to treatment at almost the same probability as the whole population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:10543406
DOI:10.1080/10543406.2023.2233598