دورية أكاديمية

A guide to outcome evaluation of simulation‐based education programmes in low and middle‐income countries.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: A guide to outcome evaluation of simulation‐based education programmes in low and middle‐income countries.
المؤلفون: Robinson, Samuel JA, Yin Mar Oo, Ljuhar, Damir, McLeod, Elizabeth, Pacilli, Maurizio, Nataraja, Ramesh M
المصدر: ANZ Journal of Surgery; Jun2024, Vol. 94 Issue 6, p1011-1020, 10p
مصطلحات موضوعية: MIDDLE-income countries, SURGICAL education, ASSESSMENT of education, RESOURCE-limited settings, IDEA (Philosophy), EVALUATION methodology
مصطلحات جغرافية: MYANMAR
مستخلص: Evaluation is a vital part of any learning activity and is essential to optimize and improve educational programmes. It should be considered and prioritized prior to the implementation of any learning activity. However, comprehensive programme evaluation is rarely conducted, and there are numerous barriers to high‐quality evaluation. This review provides a framework for conducting outcome evaluation of simulation‐based education programmes in low and middle‐income countries (LMICs). The basis of evaluation, including core ideas of theory, purpose and structure are outlined, followed by an examination of the levels and healthcare applications of the Kirkpatrick model of evaluation. Then, methods of conducting evaluation of simulation‐based education in LMICs are discussed through the lens of a successful surgical simulation programme in Myanmar, a lower‐middle‐income country. The programme involved the evaluation of 11 courses over 4 years in Myanmar and demonstrated evaluation at the highest level of the Kirkpatrick model. Reviewing this programme provides a bridge between evaluation theory and practical implementation. A range of evaluation methods are outlined, including surveys, interviews, and clinical outcome measurement. The importance of a mixed‐methods approach, enabling triangulation of quantitative and qualitative analysis, is highlighted, as are methods of analysing data, including statistical and thematic analysis. Finally, issues and challenges of conducting evaluation are considered, as well as strategies to overcome these barriers. Ultimately, this review informs readers about evaluation theory and methods, grounded in a practical application, to enable other educators in low‐resource settings to evaluate their own activities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of ANZ Journal of Surgery is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:14451433
DOI:10.1111/ans.18987