التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Revise and resubmit? Peer reviewing business historical research. |
| المؤلفون: |
Lubinski, Christina, Decker, Stephanie, MacKenzie, Niall |
| المصدر: |
Business History; Jun2024, Vol. 66 Issue 4, p773-792, 20p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
EDUCATIONAL standards, RESEARCH evaluation |
| مستخلص: |
Peer review in Business History has benefitted from the insights of over 550 expert reviewers over the past three years. In this editorial, we contextualise the journal's peer review process historically and in the available literature. We discuss some of the challenges of the double-blind review system, including securing reviewer engagement amidst time constraints and publication pressure, the dark sides of anonymisation, and the role of bias, values, and interdisciplinarity in research evaluations. Based on these reflections, we furnish some concrete guidance for reviewers on how to approach business historical research. We end by contemplating the future landscape of peer review and opening a conversation about review standards and reviewer education in the field of business history. Is peer review ripe for revision and resubmit? [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Business History is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
PDF full text from Publisher 
Full Text Finder