التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
The Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals and Managers on Patient Involvement in Care Pathway Development: A Discourse Analysis. |
| المؤلفون: |
Visser, Mildred, 't Hart, Naomi, de Mul, Marleen, Weggelaar‐Jansen, Anne Marie |
| المصدر: |
Health Expectations; Jun2024, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p1-10, 10p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
MEDICAL protocols, MEDICAL personnel, HUMAN services programs, QUALITATIVE research, RESEARCH funding, INTERVIEWING, PATIENT care, ATTITUDES of medical personnel, ACTION research, RESEARCH methodology, PSYCHOSOCIAL factors, PATIENT participation, HEALTH care teams |
| مستخلص: |
Background: The WHO advocates patient and public involvement as an ethical imperative, due to the value of the lived experience of patients. A deeper understanding of the shared meanings and underlying beliefs of healthcare professionals and managers for and against including patients in care pathway development. Objective: To explore the considerations of healthcare professionals and managers on the involvement of patients and public in care pathway development. Methods: In a medical rehabilitation centre we conducted a single case study that was part of a 2‐year action research programme on blended care pathway development. Following 14 semistructured interviews with healthcare professionals and managers, we analysed their discourses on the value of patient involvement as well as the potential threats and opportunities. Results: We identified four discourses. Patient as expert frames involvement as relevant, as adding new perspectives and as required to fully understand the patient's needs. Skills and representation is based on the construct that obtaining valuable insights from patients requires certain skills and competences. Self‐protection focusses on personal, interprofessional objections to patient involvement. Professional knows best reveals expertise‐related reasons for avoiding or postponing involvement. Conclusion: These discourses explain why patient and public involvement in care pathway development is sometimes postponed, limited in scope and level of participation, and/or avoided. The following strategies might minimise the paralysing effect of these discourses: strengthen the capabilities of all stakeholders involved; use a mix of complementary techniques to gain involvement in distinct phases of care pathway development; and create/facilitate a safe environment. Put together, these strategies would foster ongoing, reciprocal learning that could enhance patient involvement. Patient or Public Contribution: This study belonged to an action research programme on blended care pathway development (developing an integrated, coordinated patient care plan that combines remote, digital telehealth applications, self‐management tools and face‐to‐face care). Multidisciplinary teams took a quality collaborative approach to quality improvement (considering patients as stakeholders) to develop 11 blended care pathways. Although professionals and managers were instructed to invite patients onto their teams and to attend care pathway design workshops, few teams (3/11) actually did. Unravelling why this happened will help improve patient and public involvement in care pathway development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Health Expectations is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
Full Text Finder