دورية أكاديمية

Considering the review process as a constructive conversation.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Considering the review process as a constructive conversation.
المؤلفون: Anakin, M., Bishop, J., Gladman, T.
المصدر: Focus on Health Professional Education (2204-7662); 2024, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p96-97, 2p
مصطلحات موضوعية: CONVERSATION, PROFESSIONAL education
مستخلص: This article discusses the review process in health professional education scholarship. The authors emphasize the importance of viewing the review process as a constructive conversation between authors and reviewers. They suggest that feedback should be conducted as a two-way conversation, allowing both parties to co-construct their understanding of the manuscript. The authors also highlight the need for authors and reviewers to align their expectations and be open to negotiation. They encourage a reflective approach to writing and responding to feedback and emphasize the importance of dedicating time to the review process. Overall, the article promotes constructive conversations about writing and scholarship in health professional education. [Extracted from the article]
Copyright of Focus on Health Professional Education (2204-7662) is the property of ANZAHPE: Australian & New Zealand Association for Health Professional Educators and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:22047662
DOI:10.11157/fohpe.v25i2.776