التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Stakeholder mapping to support invasive non-native species management in South America. |
| المؤلفون: |
Erazo, Manuela, García-Díaz, Pablo, Langdon, Bárbara, Mustin, Karen, Cava, Mário, Damasceno, Gabriella, Huerta, Magdalena F., Linardaki, Eirini, Moyano, Jaime, Montti, Lía, Powell, Priscila A., Bodey, Thomas W., Burslem, David F. R. P., Fasola, Laura, Fidelis, Alessandra, Lambin, Xavier, Marinaro, Sofía, Pauchard, Aníbal, Phimister, Euan, Raffo, Eduardo |
| المصدر: |
NeoBiota; 2024, Issue 93, p293-319, 27p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
INTRODUCED species, AMERICAN mink, LODGEPOLE pine, PINUS radiata, BUSINESS communication, CHEATGRASS brome |
| مصطلحات جغرافية: |
CHILE, ARGENTINA |
| مستخلص: |
Effective long-term management of invasive non-native species (INNS) in South America is a pressing yet complex task. Critically, the environmental, historical, cultural, and economic idiosyncrasies of the region call for the inclusion of a plurality of views from those sectors of society receiving the negative and positive impacts of INNS. This is a multifaceted, and often daunting, task that can be aided by an early identification of stakeholders – those affected by or with an interest in INNS and their management – accompanied by targeted stakeholder engagement. Here, we report the procedures and results of a stakeholder mapping activity aimed at identifying stakeholders and designing engagement strategies. Using expert knowledge procedures, we compiled comprehensive lists of stakeholders for six case-studies in South America: (i) invasive grasses (Urochloa spp.) in Brazil; (ii) glossy privet (Ligustrum lucidum) in Argentina; (iii) lodgepole and Monterey pines (Pinus contorta and P. radiata) in Argentina; (iv) American mink (Neogale vison) in Argentina and Chile; (v) lodgepole and Monterey pines in Chile; and (vi) German yellow-jacket (Vespula germanica) in Chile. Overall, we identified 250 stakeholders, which, based on their interest and influence, were classified into "context settlers" (2%), "key players" (47%), "crowd" (5%), and "subjects" (49%). We outlined strategies to engage with each of these four groups and for each of our six case-studies. Across case studies, communication with stakeholders was the most common engagement strategy proposed (27%; 19 of 70 strategies), followed by active involvement of stakeholders in INNS research and management (23%). Our results highlight the importance of considering power imbalances, as those stakeholders more likely to benefit from INNS were assessed to have more influence over INNS management relative to local and indigenous communities. Our work illustrates how to identify stakeholders in a rigorous and rapid manner, which should be complemented with the involvement of the stakeholders themselves. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of NeoBiota is the property of Pensoft Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
Full Text Finder