التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: |
Systematic review to evaluate accuracy studies of the diagnostic criteria for periodontitis in pregnant women. |
المؤلفون: |
Conceição, Sarah dos Santos, Batista, Josicélia Estrela Tuy, Cruz, Simone Seixas da, Gomes-Filho, Isaac Suzart, Hintz, Alexandre Marcelo, Coelho, Julita Maria Freitas, Passos-Soares, Johelle de Santana, Loomer, Peter Michael, Lyrio, Amanda Oliveira, Souza, Elivan Silva, Figueiredo, Ana Cláudia Morais Godoy, Pereira, Mauricio Gomes |
المصدر: |
PLoS ONE; 7/17/2024, Vol. 19 Issue 7, p1-17, 17p |
مصطلحات موضوعية: |
PREGNANT women, PERIODONTITIS, PREGNANCY complications, CINAHL database, DISEASE prevalence |
مستخلص: |
The diversity of criteria used in the diagnosis of periodontitis in pregnant women makes it difficult to define and compare the disease. Using a systematic review, this study evaluated the accuracy of criteria for diagnosing periodontitis in pregnant women. Searches were carried out in the databases: Medline/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO, Lilacs, ProQuest, and CINAHL. Validation studies of the criteria used for diagnosing periodontitis met the inclusion criteria. The study steps were performed by three independent reviewers. A qualitative synthesis of the included articles was carried out and the quality methodological analysis using the QUADAS-2 instrument. The assessment of the quality of the evidence was obtained through the GRADE tool. A total of 592 records were identified, of which only 6 made up this systematic review. The included studies analyzed different criteria for diagnosing periodontitis, evaluating 3,005 pregnant women. The criteria selected as a test presented results equivalent to the performance of those recognized as the gold standard. The self-reported criteria were of lower diagnostic accuracy. A major limitation of this review was the small number of primary studies that evaluated clinical diagnosis of periodontitis in pregnant women, which was highly heterogeneous, making it impossible to carry out accuracy meta-analysis and additional analyzes. There is a lack of consensus on the criteria for the diagnosis of periodontitis, with great variability in the accuracy and prevalence of the disease in pregnant women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of PLoS ONE is the property of Public Library of Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |