دورية أكاديمية

Sex Differences in Fractional Flow Reserve Utilization.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Sex Differences in Fractional Flow Reserve Utilization.
المؤلفون: Bujak, Marta, Malinowski, Krzysztof, Siudak, Zbigniew, Ćmiel, Anna, Lesiak, Maciej, Bartuś, Stanisław, Legutko, Jacek, Wańha, Wojciech, Witkowski, Adam, Dudek, Dariusz, Gąsior, Mariusz, Gil, Robert, Protasiewicz, Marcin, Kubica, Jacek, Godek, Piotr, Wojakowski, Wojciech, Gąsior, Paweł
المصدر: Journal of Clinical Medicine; Jul2024, Vol. 13 Issue 14, p4028, 11p
مصطلحات موضوعية: PERCUTANEOUS coronary intervention, ACUTE coronary syndrome, LITERATURE reviews, LOGISTIC regression analysis, DELAYED diagnosis, MYOCARDIAL infarction
مستخلص: Background: The literature review shows that female patients are more frequently underdiagnosed or suffer from delayed diagnosis. Recognition of sex-related differences is crucial for implementing strategies to improve cardiovascular outcomes. We aimed to assess sex-related disparities in the frequency of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided procedures in patients who underwent angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: We have derived the data from the national registry of percutaneous coronary interventions and retrospectively analyzed the data of more than 1.4 million angiography and/or PCI procedures [1,454,121 patients (62.54% men and 37.46% women)] between 2014 and 2022. The logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore whether female sex was associated with FFR utilization. Results: The FFR was performed in 61,305 (4.22%) patients and more frequently in men than women (4.15% vs. 3.45%, p < 0.001). FFR was more frequently assessed in females with acute coronary syndrome than males (27.75% vs. 26.08%, p < 0.001); however, women with chronic coronary syndrome had FFR performed less often than men (72.25% vs. 73.92%, p < 0.001). Females with FFR-guided procedures were older than men (69.07 (±8.87) vs. 65.45 (±9.38) p < 0.001); however. less often had a history of myocardial infarction (MI) (24.79% vs. 36.73%, p < 0.001), CABG (1.62% vs. 2.55%, p < 0.005) or PCI (36.6% vs. 24.79%, p < 0.001) compared to men. Crude comparison has shown that male sex was associated with a higher frequency of FFR assessment (OR = 1.2152–1.2361, p < 0.005). Conclusions: Despite a substantial rise in FFR utilization, adoption in women remains lower than in men. Female sex was found to be an independent negative predictor of FFR use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Clinical Medicine is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:20770383
DOI:10.3390/jcm13144028