Part 1: Comparative Risk Assessment: Methods, Tools and Applications: Chapter 8: A PROPOSED FRAMEWORK FOR MULTINATIONAL COMPARATIVE RISK ANALYSIS: PESTICIDE USE, IMPACTS AND MANAGEMENT.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Part 1: Comparative Risk Assessment: Methods, Tools and Applications: Chapter 8: A PROPOSED FRAMEWORK FOR MULTINATIONAL COMPARATIVE RISK ANALYSIS: PESTICIDE USE, IMPACTS AND MANAGEMENT.
المؤلفون: Shatkin, J. A., Andreas, J., Apul, D. S., Attia, A., Brambilla, M., Carini, F., Elshayeb, Y., Girgin, S., Ignatavitus, G., Mandarász, T., Small, M., Smirnova, O., Sorvari, J., Tal, A.
المصدر: Comparative Risk Assessment & Environmental Decision Making; 2004, p149-168, 20p
مصطلحات موضوعية: RISK assessment, RISK assessment of pesticides, PEST control, ENVIRONMENTAL risk assessment, AGRICULTURAL chemicals, DECISION making, ENVIRONMENTAL impact charges, ENVIRONMENTAL protection
مستخلص: Comparative risk assessment is a natural tool for decision making regarding transboundary environmental issues. A workgroup of environmental experts met during the NATO Workshop over three days and addressed the state of the practice of comparative risk assessment and its applicability in an international context. Discussion of the application of comparative risk assessment led to a proposed case study on transboundary risks from pesticide use. Pesticides are of international concern because of transboundary trade of agricultural goods, impacts of applied pesticides on international environmental resources such as water bodies, differences in local and national safety practices, and concerns over the transferability of assessment models developed under different conditions than where pesticides are ultimately applied. Thus, a comparative assessment of potential impacts of pesticides on an international scale is proposed to be illustrative of the utility of the methodology for international environmental policy purposes. Workgroup discussions included the need to defining terminology, data needs, methods and tools for comparing risks, development of evaluation criteria, key issues regarding transboundary comparisons, and unique communication issues for international collaboration. A proposal for future work, including recommendations for international risk comparisons are also offered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Comparative Risk Assessment & Environmental Decision Making is the property of Springer Nature / Books and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index