التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
How good is the orthopaedic literature? |
| المؤلفون: |
Chaudhry, Harman, Mundi, Raman, Ishu Singh, Einhorn, Thomas A., Bhandari, Mohit |
| المصدر: |
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics; Apr-Jun2008, Vol. 42 Issue 2, p144-149, 6p, 2 Charts |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
MEDICAL literature, ORTHOPEDICS, EVIDENCE-based medicine, QUALITY, CLINICAL trials |
| مستخلص: |
Randomized trials constitute approximately 3% of the orthopaedic literature period. Concerns regarding quality of the orthopaedic literature stem from a widespread notion that the overall quality of the surgical literature is in need of improvement. Limitations of surgical research arise primarily from two pervasive issues: 1) A reliance on low levels of evidence to advance surgical knowledge, and 2) Poor reporting quality among the high level surgical evidence that is available. The scarcity of randomized trials may be largely attributable to several unique challenges which make them difficult to conduct. We present characteristics of the orthopaedic literature and address the challenges of conducting randomized trials in surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Indian Journal of Orthopaedics is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
Full Text Finder