دورية أكاديمية

Entecavir plus adefovir rescue therapy for chronic hepatitis B patients after multiple treatment failures in real-life practice.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Entecavir plus adefovir rescue therapy for chronic hepatitis B patients after multiple treatment failures in real-life practice.
المؤلفون: Xian-Hua Xu, Gai-Li Li, Yang Qin, Qiang Li, Fa-Qun He, Jin-Ye Li, Quan-Rong Pan, Jie-Yin Deng
المصدر: Virology Journal; 2013, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p1-5, 5p, 1 Chart, 1 Graph
مصطلحات موضوعية: HEPATITIS B, CREATINE kinase, CHRONIC hepatitis B, LAMIVUDINE, DRUG efficacy, SEROCONVERSION, PATIENTS
مستخلص: Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Entecavir (ETV) plus adefovir (ADV) for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients after multiple nucleos(t)ide analogue (NAs) failure treatment. Methods: Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients who had a suboptimal response or developed resistance to two or more previous NAs treatments were included, and all subjects were treated with ETV in combination with ADV for ⩾ 24 months. Complete virologic response (CVR) was defined as an undetectability of serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level during treatment. Safety assessment was based on the increasing of serum creatinine and creatine kinase levels. Results: A total of 45 eligible patients were included. Twenty-five patients had been treated with lamivudine (LAM) or telbivudine (LdT) and developed genotypic resistance. Resistance to ADV was present in 18 patients and 4 patients had a suboptimal response to ETV. Two patients had a resistance to both LAM and ADV. The cumulative probabilities of CVR at 12 and 24 months of ETV + ADV treatment were 88.9% (40/45) and 97.8% (44/45), respectively. Although one patient failed to achieve CVR, its serum HBV DNA level decreased by 3.3 log copies/mL after 24 months of combination therapy. The cumulative probability of HBeAg seroconversion was 15.6% (7/45) and 26.7% (12/45) at 12 and 24 months of treatment, respectively. History of prior exposure to specific NAs did not make a difference to ETV + ADV treatment outcome. There were no significant adverse events related to ETV + ADV therapy observed in the study subjects. Conclusion: ETV + ADV can be used as an effective and safe rescue therapy in patients after multiple NA therapy failures, especially in the areas where tenofovir is not yet available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Virology Journal is the property of BioMed Central and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:1743422X
DOI:10.1186/1743-422X-10-162