التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Laparoscopic vs Open Pyeloplasty in Children: Results of a Randomized, Prospective, Controlled Trial. |
| المؤلفون: |
Gatti, John M., Amstutz, Sable P., Bowlin, Paul R., Stephany, Heidi A., Murphy, J. Patrick |
| المصدر: |
Journal of Urology; Mar2017 Part 1, Vol. 197 Issue 3, p792-797, 6p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
URETERIC obstruction, LAPAROSCOPIC surgery, URETEROPLASTY, JUVENILE diseases, LENGTH of stay in hospitals, RANDOMIZED controlled trials, LONGITUDINAL method, THERAPEUTICS |
| مستخلص: |
Purpose Open dismembered pyeloplasty is the preferred repair for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Minimally invasive techniques have been applied to the original open approach but no clear advantage has been demonstrated for these technological advances. We evaluate outcomes between transperitoneal laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in children. Materials and Methods All children 1 to 18 years old with ureteropelvic junction obstruction requiring operative repair were offered enrollment in the study. Patients were prospectively randomized to either laparoscopic or open pyeloplasty through a flank incision. Results A total of 50 patients in the laparoscopic group and 48 in the open group were enrolled from 2005 to 2014. Mean followup was similar between the groups (13.7 months in the laparoscopic group vs 12.3 months in the open group, p = 0.54). The only significantly different outcomes were for mean operative time, which was 139.5 minutes (range 94 to 213) in the laparoscopic group and 122.5 minutes (83 to 239) in the open group (p <0.01), and mean length of stay, which was 25.9 hours (18 to 143) in the laparoscopic group and 28.2 hours (16 to 73) in the open group (p = 0.02). Analgesic usage, success rate, total charges and all parameters in children older than 11 years were similar between the groups. Conclusions Open and laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty are comparable and effective methods for repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Although operative time was statistically shorter in the open group and length of stay was shorter in the laparoscopic group, the clinical significance of these variables is questionable. The approach to repair may best be based on family preference for incision aesthetics and surgeon comfort with either approach, rather than more classically objective outcome measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Journal of Urology is the property of Wolters Kluwer UK and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Supplemental Index |
Full Text Finder