دورية أكاديمية

Combined Effects of Glenohumeral Mobilization, Stretching, and Thoracic Manipulation on Shoulder Internal Rotation Range of Motion.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Combined Effects of Glenohumeral Mobilization, Stretching, and Thoracic Manipulation on Shoulder Internal Rotation Range of Motion.
المؤلفون: Swanson, Brian T., Hagenbruch, Marissa, Lapaan, Bernardine, Skipalskiy, Kirill
المصدر: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy; 2024, Vol. 19 Issue 4, p394-409, 16p
مصطلحات موضوعية: GLENOHUMERAL joint physiology, SHOULDER pain treatment, PHYSICAL therapy, STRETCH (Physiology), RESEARCH funding, ADDUCTION, T-test (Statistics), DATA analysis, STATISTICAL sampling, QUESTIONNAIRES, MANIPULATION therapy, TREATMENT effectiveness, RANDOMIZED controlled trials, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, ROTATIONAL motion, ELECTROMYOGRAPHY, ROTATOR cuff, PRE-tests & post-tests, SUPINE position, RESEARCH methodology, ANALYSIS of variance, STATISTICS, COMPARATIVE studies, DATA analysis software, CONFIDENCE intervals, RANGE of motion of joints, THORACIC vertebrae
مستخلص: Background/purpose Interventions including posterior glenohumeral mobilizations (PGM), sleeper stretches, and thoracic manipulation are commonly used to address posterior shoulder tightness. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of adding thoracic manipulation to PGM and sleeper stretches on passive range of motion (PROM), joint mobility, and infraspinatus electromyographic (EMG) activity in shoulders with decreased internal rotation (IR) PROM. Design Randomized Sequential Intervention Laboratory Study Methods Forty individuals with clinically significant IR loss attended two study sessions. Participants were randomized to receive five 30 seconds bouts of either grade III PGM or sleeper stretching. Following a seven-day washout period, all participants attended a second session and received a prescriptive supine HVLA manipulation targeting the T3-4 segment, followed by the previously randomized intervention. Outcome measures included internal rotation PROM, horizontal adduction PROM, posterior glenohumeral joint translation assessed via ultrasound imaging, and EMG activity of the infraspinatus during a PGM. All outcome measures were assessed pre- and immediately post-intervention and compared statistically. Results There were significant within-group, but not between-group, differences for IR and horizontal adduction PROM following a single session of PGM or sleeper stretch. When combined with thoracic manipulation, significantly smaller within session changes of IR PROM were observed for both PGM (mean difference 4.4, p=0.017) and sleeper stretches (mean difference 6.4, p=0.0005). There were no significant between group differences for horizontal adduction PROM, humeral head translation, or EMG activity across all time points. Discussion Both GH posterior mobilizations and sleeper stretches improved IR and horizontal adduction PROM in a single session. The addition of thoracic manipulation prior to local shoulder interventions resulted in smaller gains of both IR and horizontal adduction ROM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy is the property of North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Supplemental Index
الوصف
تدمد:21592896
DOI:10.26603/001c.95040